2006-12-20 15:56:50 · 28 answers · asked by dstr 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
this is meant as a non-partisan question
2006-12-20 15:57:19 · update #1
It is not disrespectful, it is a hazardous mistake. To refer to him as an idiot is to risk not seeing what he and his sponsors are up to. There are playing a most risky and dangerous game, playing with the future of this country and the Middle East. The mess in Iraq and Afghanistan is not bungling, but a deliberate plan worked out in advance, to plunder Iraq, build an oil pipeline across Afghanistan from the Caspian Sea, sell heroin big time with Afghan poppies, raid the US Treasury, and jack up oil prices. I'd say they have done pretty well for themselves. No matter they have bankrupted this country and killed hundreds of thousands. That's just all collateral damage in their game plan.
2006-12-20 16:06:39 · answer #1 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
As it should be considered yes it is disrespectful to refer to a Bush as a moron or a idiot someone could take offense after all those poor people would never want to be lumped in with him or his father ( for that matter any of his family personally I wonder if they are inbreed they seem to all have the same traits whether born or married into the clan ) they are far to intelligent to want to be called a Bush
2006-12-20 16:04:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No - because he is. And just remember some of things that the Republicans called Bill Clinton. But, he was a Rhodes scholar so they couldn't call him an idiot, just everything else imaginable. And they're still at it for some strange reason!!! And calling Bush an idiot is probably putting it too mildly - he's not even that smart.
2006-12-20 16:13:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
When you call a President an idiot, you are not insulting him but the Office of the Presidency which is greater than any man could ever be. It is respect for the nation that should keep you from making derogatory remarks. But in the case of any politician, it is always a case of what have you done for me lately.
2006-12-20 16:12:57 · answer #4 · answered by Cherry_Blossom 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
NO. But I would call him and idiot when on TV and a moron every other time he is with some visiting dignitary since he still cannot formulate a simple sentence by himself. In some ways he is even dumber than R.R. was. At least R.R. could tell good jokes, I don't think GW even realizes that the biggest joke in America today is his Name and his lifestyle.
2006-12-20 16:01:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
No, it is not disrespectful, but it does tend to put morons and idiots in a bad light.
2006-12-20 16:03:02 · answer #6 · answered by Frank R 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Is it diverse as to call Hillary a Nazi or commie. to date as Bush is in touch if the shoe suits positioned on it, those names are no longer that faraway. there is something noted as the liberty of speech
2016-10-15 08:43:44 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a Samurai I prefer the word fool
2006-12-20 16:11:09 · answer #8 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This is a non partisan answer. Bush is neither a moron nor an idiot. He earned 2 Ivy League degrees. How many do you have? Do you know what the Ivy League is?
Remember, when you point a finger at someone, there are 3 fingers pointing back at you. When you hurl mindless insults, it only reflects on your own intellectual capacity.
2006-12-20 16:01:46 · answer #9 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 5⤊ 5⤋
It's very disrespectful to the office of the President-
2006-12-20 16:07:09 · answer #10 · answered by josh m 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋