tweety bird..He would do a better job than anyone else that's running and besides he deserves something good in his life. that mean old putty tat is always mean to him. LOL
2006-12-20 15:10:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by chilover 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Rudy Giuliani has much more experience than a second term senator. Rudy has my vote!
2006-12-20 15:08:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by jay r 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
Well since I lived in NYS for 21 years, I think my opnion should be good.
Hilary Clinton will lead to the destruction to the United States and Rudy Giuliani is the most corrupt, evil snake i have ever seen in my life. How either could be even concidered canidates for president BLOWS MY MIND!!
2006-12-20 15:10:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by rehcueguy 2
·
4⤊
2⤋
Hillary Clinton, she has the most experience in goverment. Come on, she lived in the White House for 8 years. I don't know however, if Clinton's husband can adjust to being called the First Gentleman. If he still gets to be called Mr. President, wouldn't he then be called First Gentleman Mr. President Clinton? I'll have to ponder on that one. In the mean time, I'll sit bored and 15 while waiting for 2009 to role around- so I can vote. It isn't fair to me that I know the government inside and out and yet I am not responsible enough to elect my leaders? By the way, if you guys are around in 2048, vote for me- visit my web page:
http://www.geocities.com/jameskidd2009/homepage
Don't forget to sign the guestbook.
*My 100th answer*
2006-12-20 16:41:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by jameskidd2009 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
rudy he would be a great president. do you know he is in the world record books because under his administration as mayor the crime rate in new york dropped by 60% that's a lot and I'm pretty sure that with him in office those terrorists will be well on the run. as president I actually think he will be able to achieve something in Iraq and help get the violence down and get our troops finally home.
2006-12-20 18:39:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Juzzy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would probably vote for Rudy because it would be a crushing defeat to the evangelicals and radical right wing in America.
2006-12-20 17:15:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by txwebber 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rudy called out the NY Fire Department, Clinton was on the bridge of the Commander and Chief office of the United States of America for eight full years.
Clinton has more experience with large Federal Government operations and she was hands on Governer's wife's experence in security matters. And no one can match her experience except Albert Gore Jr.
2006-12-20 15:20:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by zclifton2 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Given those two choices I would vote for Rudy. Hellary is Satanic. There might be some hope for Rudy.
However, I am already committed to another candidate who better represents me. His name is Eric Kirkland. He'll probably be the youngest, and McCain the oldest, in the Republican primaries and he'll bring a lot of energy and new blood into the entire political system.
2006-12-20 15:13:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Hillary
2006-12-20 19:58:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Renee B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not Rudy - before 9/11 he was most famous for moving his mistress into the official residence before his divorce was final, we don't need another morally challenged president!!
2006-12-20 16:07:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by ash 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Giuliani, because he is a moderate, middle of the road, republican with a record of common sense. No vote for Hillary because she's a fraud, deceitful, flip-flopping on the issues, power hungry politician who wants to promote her "world village" (new world order) and I'm afraid America has let the Clinton's get away with murder. We will see. Regardless, the closer we get to 2008, the more muck scraping we will see. I can't wait to see what new facts they expose on Hillary.
2006-12-20 15:12:04
·
answer #11
·
answered by dasuberding 7
·
2⤊
2⤋