Yes, and they don't care!
2006-12-20 13:34:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
3⤋
See Yahoo internet below "Pelosi help for NAMBLA". the yank Spectator and the Patriot positioned up the two state that Pelosi marched interior the 2001 gay delight in San Francisco, 3 spots faraway from Harry Hay. tremendously obtrusive help, or a minimum of taking part in to the hugely gay community in San Francisco. Hillary of course helps NAMBLA besides.
2016-10-15 08:32:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can't stand Nancy Pelosi, but I don't think you can quite pin "Supports NAMBLA" on her. She was in a gay parade (which she did not organize), which also happened to have Harry Hay in it, a gay activist whom has written articles supporting NAMBLA's right to participate in gay pride events.
Now, you could probably make the argument that if she knew that Harry Hay was going to be in the parade, and knew about Harry Hay's support of NAMBLA, then she could have/should have boycotted the parade because of Hay's participation in it and what he represents. She didn't; she participated. But I don't know if her participation can be construed as a specific, direct support of NAMBLA.
Although, knowing Pelosi, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if she thought NAMBLA was perfectly fine...
2006-12-20 13:52:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by CO_Hiker 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
Democrats both then, now and in-between, don’t get it. Criticism for those among them is reserved for situations where it can be useful for poticial benefit, and not to correct or eliminate bad behavior. In Studds’ case, the censure vote - for those Democrats who did vote for censure - represented an obligatory participation in a meaningless formality. Witness, the three standing ovations virtually at the moment of censure. Shocking behavior? Not among Democrats.
Classic Democrat behavior!
2006-12-20 15:40:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by jay r 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
You just can't grow up can ya? The steam that blows the whistle never turns the wheel. Why don't you try being part of the solution and not perpetuating the stereotype of ignominy. Never mind, you're lost. I hear there is this new help group called sour grapes anonymous check in to it. Does 'sore loser man' mean anything to ya.
2006-12-20 13:45:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Joe Schmo from Kokomo 6
·
2⤊
4⤋
Pre election hype. You lost. Get with the times.
2006-12-20 13:57:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Reba K 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
I've heard that she's a "watcher",,,,Does she have your address,or phone number,for future reference
2006-12-20 13:34:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Even if they do, I'm sure they don't care.
2006-12-20 14:38:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
do you expect us to believe crap from a website of a newservice(yeah right) that can't afford someone to build a quality one?
2006-12-20 13:37:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by qncyguy21 6
·
6⤊
3⤋
mental disorder. btw liberals thanks for the laughs, you people really crack me up with your vision or bizarre understanding of world events. I mean, do you really believe what you post or do you just hate facts that much. well any way, once again thanks for the laughs.
2006-12-20 13:40:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
the real question is, do they care?
no they dont. they support every type of sleaze on the planet.
2006-12-20 13:36:21
·
answer #11
·
answered by Buk (Fey) 3
·
4⤊
3⤋