English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

"WWE is the Major leagues while TNA is the minor leagues" My response-If that is so, why did Christian leave WWE when WWE offered him a contract extension and refused it?

"At least WWE makes there own stars and TNA steals them"

I could of swore TNA made Samoa Joe, Aj styles, christopher daniels, eric young and many others. And dont try to say Ron Killings wasnt made by TNA becuase he was. In WWE he never won a big title, in TNA he did. Which resulted in huge popularity for hi

"TNA is the retirement home for old wrestlers"

How can you say that when WWE continually has Ric Flair, Hulk Hogan, Dusty Rhodes, Undertaker, Roddy Piper wrestling?

"TNA is where WWE rejects go"

Is Christian a "reject"? Actually, he refused a contract extension from WWE! Angle asked to be release, so actually WWE is a Kurt Angle reject! And Tyson Tomko isnt a WWE reject, he requested a release. And to smart asses to who say AJ Styles is, he actually rejected a developmental deal from WWE!

2006-12-20 11:57:35 · 15 answers · asked by MikeAwesome 5 in Sports Wrestling

Seems like the first person was affected by what i said. Mark another win for me!

2006-12-20 12:02:36 · update #1

15 answers

Finally someone has spoken up. I myself was sick and tired of people commenting negatively on TNA when more than half of those people have barely ever seen TNA. We all admit WWE has been the most popular wrestling promotion since ages. But now if another promotion tries to compete with the WWE, why do people hate it so much? Why not give it a chance and lets see the outcome? Just by listening to other people they form their own views about how TNa sucks.
I admit I use to hate TNA too a long time ago. But I decided to give it a try and I have been watching it ever since. TNA is original and trying to be different from the WWE. So why not watch them both and get the best of both shows.
And for those people who think Tna steals WWE stars, why di WWE steal TNA star Monty Brown?
When people say TNA is where WWE rejects go, WWE is where Tna rejects go. Look at Monty Brown, he was a waste of space of TNA, no wonder WWE took him. THey are specially known for pushing big guys with no talent.

I' m basically trying to say that don't judge TNA based on other people's opinions about it.

2006-12-20 13:02:15 · answer #1 · answered by CodeRed 4 · 1 1

I am more of an online wrestling fan and once in a while I watch both TNA and WWE. Which one is better? Hard to say for me. TNA seems to focus more on the wrestling than it does the entertainment, that a point in my book because I have been watching wrestling since the 80's which is when it was all about the wrestling. That's a point in my book. They also highlight the southern barnyard style wrestiling (x division). The WWE doesn't seem to use their crusierweight very well. That's another point in my book.

The WWE though has more and better tallent. To me the great tallent in TNA is Angle, Styles, Joe, Sting, Nash, Jarrett, and Abyss. When I say great tallent I mean either in or out of the ring. Wrestlers like Cage, Killings, Daniels, Rhyno, and a lot others I jsut don't find as entertaining. WWE has Michaels, HHH, Orton, Edge, Flair, Undertaker, Booker, Benoit, RVD, Mysterio, Kane, Kennedy, and some others. So they win that race. Their only problem is that they have champions like Cena, Batista, and Lashley.

Now I'm only saying that WWE is better now... but they are not getting better by the day. On the other hand, TNA is on the fast rise. I think once TNA gets a 2 hour time slot and a couple other big names (roomers are going around about RVD, Tazz, Benoit, and Mysterio jumping ship). As of now I am putting WWE ahead of TNA just because they have more assets. If TNA keeps going at the pace they are... the WWE has something to worry about.

Oh and by the way your statement is kind of hypocritical. "Isn't it funny when WWE fans make fun of TNA when the WWE is alot worse?" That is opinionated and the reverse could be said "Isn't it funny when TNA fans make fun of WWE when TNA is alot worse?"

P.S. Anyone notice how TNA is known as TNA while the WWE is known as "THE" WWE? Sorry I just wanted to add that little note.

2006-12-20 12:49:21 · answer #2 · answered by average_joe397 4 · 1 0

I feel that the biggest reason that people diss TNA is because it is different then what most younger folks are used. When people say Wrestling, WWE is the first that comes to mind. I started watching wrestling in the early/mid 70's when it was WWWF. Then it was good guys vs. bad guys and the wrestling is what made the sport so popular. After the Golden Age (Hulkamania) things started to go downhill. I quickly switched to WCW because it wasn't so raunchy. I am so glad that TNA offers wrestling back to the wrestling fans. Just look at the X Division! To those that have only really known WWE this seems a bit lackluster because they are looking for the glam, not the style. Just my opinion.

2006-12-20 12:08:49 · answer #3 · answered by badgerman 2 · 1 2

well first off undertaker is not even close to a retirement home for old wrestlers and i think they are both good shows but you must watch wwe if you know all these facts about the wwe and ppl like tna cuz its fresh faces and fresh story lines cuz no competition for awhile and those who say tna sucks either have not seen it or like you and watch it but yet talk smack about it either way i think both shows have alot to offer each other to make the business better in the long haul

2006-12-20 12:24:18 · answer #4 · answered by froggy348 1 · 1 0

Well I like both WWE and TNA I just like to watch some wrestling. period.

2006-12-20 12:28:13 · answer #5 · answered by hawkhead91 3 · 1 0

WWE is better than TNA, can be sure about it!
And for the statisticians I can see that the most people in the world think just like me!

2006-12-20 12:13:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

WHILE I AGREE WITH MOST OF WHAT U SAID...UNDERTAKER IS'NT EVEN CLOSE TO RETIRING IN MY BOOK,IF HE DOES I WILL STOP WATCHING WWE ALTOGETHER SINCE HE IS THE MAIN REASON I WATCH ANYWAY(even though i've been watching wrestling long before he was on) WWE DOES PRETTY MUCH SUCK NOW ,EXCEPT FOR THE DEADMAN,KANE,BOOGEYMAN,BOOKER T,FINLAY,MR KENNEDY&ASHLEY,I WATCH ALL WRESTLING AND WILL CONTINUE TO FOREVER!!!!!!!!

2006-12-20 12:39:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

they probably get mad bc TNA is better. and ron killings sucked as K'Kwick. i still think kurt angle sucks

2006-12-20 13:44:56 · answer #8 · answered by rizinoutlaw 5 · 0 0

so true man,I don't know what the hell is wrong with these stupid kids.tna is about wrestling like it should be,in tna you don't get a title because women like the way you look,you have to have real wrestling skills.

2006-12-20 12:56:35 · answer #9 · answered by steeler nation!!!!!!! 3 · 0 2

tna is good but ppl work all day or go to school and just want to wacth tv tna isnt that great .its just a whole bunch of cruiser weights and rateings prove that wwe is better than tna but i try to wacth tna no drama there.Even football and other sports have drama.


P.S. another win for me

2006-12-20 12:12:44 · answer #10 · answered by Kingofkingsofkings 3 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers