English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What are the politicians motives behind mass immigration?It seems to me that especially in the u.s. that most people are against the mexicans coming through the border.So my point is...Why do the governments allow this to be if it is obviously causing so much unrest. I thought that politicians (through democracy and the elective process)were the mouthpiece of the public! so whats going wrong?

2006-12-20 11:33:05 · 10 answers · asked by returnofkarlos 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

10 answers

Bottom line is your answer. The government wants power over more people that pay at least some taxes.

2006-12-20 11:40:03 · answer #1 · answered by Ibredd 7 · 0 0

Who said we're territorial? Ever been to a big city? A moose is territorial, people are more like ants. You're already building a wall, what more, shoot them? Politicians don"t "allow" it, it's a historical process that needs study instead of knee-jerk reactions.Until a solution is found, people need to lighten up and relax. The media isn't helping by whipping up emotions. It's not just an American problem, every developed nation is dealing with it. I think if we helped make poor countries better places to live the citizens wouldn't be so desperate to leave.

2006-12-20 11:48:26 · answer #2 · answered by Crash 7 · 0 0

Human development happens when the gene pool is expanded, - when diverse cultures come into contact with one another, and share ideas - and when we go through a time of hardship. So you have new neighbours. Long term, no problems, but in the short term we get a little irate so blame our problems on anything that is easy to blame our problems on. Folks who are different to you is an easy option out. Colour of skin is obvious, way they speak next, religion,

If the US allowed free trade with its American neighbours, wealth would be shared out more evenly, and migration across its boarders would cease. However without Mexicans to do the low paidwages - America would grind to a halt. You can not afford to shut your boarders, no body would clean your streets, mind you kids, or unblock the drains. Wake up and smell the roses - its the same in Europe. in 1996 it was Serbian refugees, who did the low paid work, then it was Kurdish now its Polish, next year it will be Romanian....

2006-12-20 11:42:21 · answer #3 · answered by DAVID C 6 · 0 0

Mexico is sending their surplus uneducated poor to the USA
1. to prevent a revolution in Mexico where only one percent owns the country
2.to take back or regain the lost territories lost in the 1850's fly the Mexican flag.
3. investors and owners in the USA are becoming obscene rich from this overlap..
4.lost of the middle class will cause a greater gap in the haves-havenots...by the purchase of congress ....your senators and reps are brought and sold by the elite...this may lead to a military type government for the USA

2006-12-20 11:46:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well, I think it's like a leaky faucet. If the problem isn't taken care of early enough, you have to deal with a flood.

IMO: I often think the politics goes along with North American Supercontinent idea. WWIII is inevitable and we will need more people for homeland defense.

I could be wrong, but I'm just a bystander. I don't want to pay for them and their babies though!

2006-12-20 11:42:42 · answer #5 · answered by Nels 7 · 0 0

If humans were, as you put it, "territorial", the only people in America would be the indigenous peoples as no-one else would have gone there.

2006-12-20 12:11:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Who knows what the government thinks, they never made any sense before so why should they start now?

2006-12-20 11:37:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

you can intergrate if you are similar. yanks could intergrate in britain, and aussies easy enough, but when ones way of life is so different and religeons I would not want to live anywhere that was too different like that.

2006-12-20 12:07:41 · answer #8 · answered by trucker 5 · 0 0

By inferrence, you'd need something other than a human nature.

2006-12-20 11:35:58 · answer #9 · answered by vanamont7 7 · 0 0

theres no going back so i guess we have to live with it

2006-12-20 11:35:15 · answer #10 · answered by jinx 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers