English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

27 answers

I would have to say so.

2006-12-20 08:57:50 · answer #1 · answered by cutelashon 3 · 1 3

Hardly--if she's truly a good woman, she has nothing to be shamefaced about, and she will not be obedient to commands which would cause her to not be a good woman.

2006-12-20 08:59:53 · answer #2 · answered by cross-stitch kelly 7 · 2 0

I think a better word is humble. Yes, I would say that humility is one of the most important things I look for in all people, but especially with regards to relationships.

Shame-faced and obedient? What is this, ancient Japan?

2006-12-20 09:00:13 · answer #3 · answered by James McPoopy Face 1 · 2 0

Do I look shamefaced and obedient to you? If you say this to me, I'm going to kick your a$$

2006-12-20 09:02:15 · answer #4 · answered by Sakura ♥ 6 · 2 1

No. But you really need to specify a good woman in relation to what? A man? no! NO!!!! Try that inclusion as the definition of a man. Doesn't work there either.

2006-12-20 09:07:32 · answer #5 · answered by Lynn B 2 · 0 0

You must be on a debate team somewhere to come up with that one. Go to Iraq for awhile and see if you can ask that one when you get back.

2006-12-20 09:03:28 · answer #6 · answered by JAMI E 5 · 0 0

You're sick. Any good woman for you should slap you up side the head

2006-12-20 09:02:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Ah, no.

Welcome to the New Millenium, @sshole!

2006-12-20 09:07:36 · answer #8 · answered by zen 7 · 1 0

hmmm obedient? hahaha no, it's a woman you're talking about not a dog, what's your culture?

2006-12-20 08:58:51 · answer #9 · answered by Julio M 3 · 4 0

Heck naw that would not my definition of a good woman.

2006-12-20 08:56:59 · answer #10 · answered by Lucy Lu 4 · 2 1

I think you would not fit in my definition of a MAN.

2006-12-20 08:58:25 · answer #11 · answered by lizzy 5 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers