I would have to say so.
2006-12-20 08:57:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by cutelashon 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
Hardly--if she's truly a good woman, she has nothing to be shamefaced about, and she will not be obedient to commands which would cause her to not be a good woman.
2006-12-20 08:59:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by cross-stitch kelly 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think a better word is humble. Yes, I would say that humility is one of the most important things I look for in all people, but especially with regards to relationships.
Shame-faced and obedient? What is this, ancient Japan?
2006-12-20 09:00:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by James McPoopy Face 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
Do I look shamefaced and obedient to you? If you say this to me, I'm going to kick your a$$
2006-12-20 09:02:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sakura ♥ 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
No. But you really need to specify a good woman in relation to what? A man? no! NO!!!! Try that inclusion as the definition of a man. Doesn't work there either.
2006-12-20 09:07:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lynn B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You must be on a debate team somewhere to come up with that one. Go to Iraq for awhile and see if you can ask that one when you get back.
2006-12-20 09:03:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by JAMI E 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're sick. Any good woman for you should slap you up side the head
2006-12-20 09:02:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Ah, no.
Welcome to the New Millenium, @sshole!
2006-12-20 09:07:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by zen 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
hmmm obedient? hahaha no, it's a woman you're talking about not a dog, what's your culture?
2006-12-20 08:58:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Julio M 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
Heck naw that would not my definition of a good woman.
2006-12-20 08:56:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Lucy Lu 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think you would not fit in my definition of a MAN.
2006-12-20 08:58:25
·
answer #11
·
answered by lizzy 5
·
4⤊
0⤋