English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A Conspiracy or what? Do you think we should be over in Iraq, to make people democratic, even if they don't want to be? What other things you thing America should be taking part in? What do you think about the Bush administration, and Bush's rejection to Rumsfeld advice, and now sending in more troops? Have you seen the movie Loose Change? Your opinions?! I am very curious!

2006-12-20 08:27:04 · 12 answers · asked by Britterrsssss 2 in News & Events Current Events

12 answers

911 conspiracy theory is full of holes too although those films can be quite compelling its really just editing job. There are just too much 'cherry picking' of facts, interview excerpts... etc. Here's some example how they twist facts to create dramatic 911 stories.

Some bloggers and 911 theorists say hijackers are found alive and links to BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well.’ What they don’t say is that this BBC article is about confusion over hijackers’ true identities. It appears hijackers may have assumed someone else's IDs. Criminals using false IDs? Hard to believe? BBC article ends by saying “FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.” That’s why the title put quotation mark around ‘suspects’ when it says ‘suspects alive and well.’

You can read this BBC entire article here http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm
You’ll notice in the middle of this BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well’ it also says in bold face ‘Mistaken Identity.’ Conspiracy gurus never even finished the entire article it appears and have reading comprehension of sixth grader. This article is used to claim that hijackers are made up/fake people in this ‘conspiracy.’ Yes, it’s sad. Please read the entire article and learn something called CONTEXT.

Twin towers never fell at free fall speed as Professor Jones claims. He makes eye ball estimate and do not make actual measurements. Several have made calculations showing the towers fell close to free fall because of massive kinetic energy, but frame by frame calculation shows it does not fall at ‘free fall’ speed. You can actually see some debris falling faster than building is collapsing in some footages. Usually demolition takes almost month of gutting and preparation for much smaller buildings. Twin towers were not taken down with bombs as claim by some. http://www.debunking911.com

Building 7 had a giant hole stretching over 10 floors and its picture exists, but conspiracy theorists probably don't want you to see since it dampens their 'demolition' theory. See the photo here. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm Conspiracy theorists do not discuss this massive structural damage, but talk about ‘pull’ quote that is very vague and arbitrary. Why would Silverstein, who is not familiar with demolition at all, use demolition slang to admit something so odd on national TV? That doesn’t make sense.

911 conspiracy theory claim Rumsfeld said flight 93 was shot down. On 9-11-01 it is Cheney who mistakenly believes 2 planes were shot down by Airforce during the attacks. Cheney have ordered to take down any hijacked planes that may be heading for a target after WTC was hit. Rumsfeld tells Cheney he knows one plane is down, but can’t confirm who brought down the plane (flight 93). This episode was explained in PBS’s Frontline: Dark Side. They had obtained actual transcript of their conversation. You can see this transcript here http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/view/ Cheney/Rumsfeld conversation is shown in ‘part one’ at beginning of documentary. Lot of stories about gov shooting down flight 93, missile theories...etc seem to have originated from this.

Rumsfeld was in Pentagon when it was hit and helped rescue crew which was caught on video. Why would he or others order missile to hit it when they're in the building. Several light poles at near by high way were knocked down short ways from Pentagon. Did single missile swerve around in chasing after skinny light poles before hitting pentagon? Was it a big fat Tomahawk missile that is wide as commercial airliner’s wing span? Some cars were damaged too by the plane grazing over highways.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0274.shtml

Many claim Pentagon had auto missile defense that could have shot down planes entering its airspace, but such project really never took full effect because of fear that civilian plane may be shot down and might pose danger to neighboring residents. Can you imagine some newly licensed pilot flying single engine Cessna into Pentagon air space getting shot down by missile or anti aircraft guns? Richard Clarke, former counter-terrorism official explained this. Ask him about it. How many times do you see planes go off course by accident? Gov officials didn’t want to endanger its own citizens for extremely unlikely scenario.

Some claim debunking911 websites are debunked and links to infowar website, but there they only discuss ‘pull’ comment again which is very vague and arbitrary and they do not discuss other countless flaws in 911 conspiracy theory. They do not explain the fact that many experts have explained ‘molten metals’ and several structural engineers and experts have disputed Steve Jones’s (physicist and not structural engineer) theory.

Debunking911 websites were never debunked, because 911 theorists never explained why things in debunking911 websites are wrong. There are just too many odd assumptions in these 911 theories. 911 theorists do engage in what we now call ‘cherry picking of information’ in order to complete their picture of reality.

Why would government kill 3000 of it own citizens to make case for a war when they can just generate evidence of WMD using intelligence which is so much easier? The US went to war without UN Security Council clearance anyways and have taken military actions without UN clearance in the past. If we can go to war whenever we want to why kill 3000 people? Just for the fun?

Why would so many authorities make bold claims that reveal this so called 'inside job' if it is inside job? As 911 theory people claim. Did Nixon ever go on TV and say 'oh yea I bugged those suckers' before whole thing became public? Lot of 911 theory claims don't make sense. If you have secret plot to bring down buildings and disguise it as terrorism would you tell people about it on TV interviews or in public?

Also check out http://www.loosechangeguide.com/lcg2.html

2006-12-21 14:24:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

America is in so many countries trying to reform the people. Leave them alone and let them kill each other and not us. Why are American troops in Iraq? Because this country makes money by having them there. Nobody even mentions binladen anymore. Why is he still alive?

9-11 was tragic and unfortunate. I believe it was not a conspiracy per se. More like the bumbling of bureaucracy at it's finest hour. The left hand didn't know what the right hand was doing and the foreigners know that and that is how 9-11 happened. Idiocy. Foreigners are not stupid, they just act like it. Of course they do so that they can fool people into taking pilot lessons without recourse. Now there is recourse, not then.

Lets throw another 100 Billion into a country, Iraq, where we don't even belong instead of putting the billion to work for us here. Before the war the economy was in the toilet. War changed that, now it's thriving. Look at the prices of metals. Not gold but metals like steel, copper, aluminum, at record highs due to this war. This war is helping America's pockets, not it's people. Not my pockets, not yours either, but the government's.

2006-12-20 10:20:19 · answer #2 · answered by jayndee13 4 · 0 0

9/11 was a conspiracy by Islamists to harm America...

Our response to it has been ludicrous at best. The invasion of Afghanistan was justified, and should have been done by the Clinton administration.

Transferring some 80% of the troops for the Iraq invasion was a terrible error on the part of Rumsfield and Bush...

Now the Taliban have taken control of large sections of Afghanistan... the NATO troops are losing control of the country because there are simply not enough troops.

At this point, the Taliban are now openingly showing themselves, giving interviews, they no longer hide in caves, they hang out publicly in villages.

And Iraq has devolved into complete chaos, with some Iraqis publicly stating they had much better lives under Saddam Hussein...

All this because the neo-conservatives, particularly Bush, Cheney and Rumsfield failed utterly in planning post invasion policy...

Just my .10

-dh

2006-12-20 08:37:12 · answer #3 · answered by delicateharmony 5 · 0 1

It was Islam.By the way they did this ,it shows us that they mean business.I don't agree with Iraq situation.I would had only wished all this money and all this effort would have been made to hunt down that piece of Fn SH*t bin laden and all his impotent brothers and
bring them here for some gladiator games.make them our b*t*h,believe me I have got Ideas.This was not just a US attack, it was against 83 different countries.HOW twisted and evil do you have to be to come up with something like this.My tolerance has shrunk quite a bit since then.And then it bothers Muslims that some people just don't play nice any longer -well take a damn reality check and see when the last time was western nations crashed commercial airliners into their real estate.and this crappy nonsense of if we all become Muslim they will forgive us? WTF WTF WTF.I do not need their forgiveness for anything more the other way around.my religion was there first deal with it.----there,thanks for letting me get that of my chest.

2006-12-20 13:37:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ı am from east. when ı used to see holywood movies ı used to believe them and ı used to think that you people are really smart. but now ı cannot believe how you people vote for bush ???? we can see it from here why cannot you see from there. bush is servant to the petroleum kings in usa they made him president so they want oil from him and he can do anythink even he can kill his people to find a reason to steal others petroleum. if you think ı am wrong then tell me godsake, how an arab can do such a plan and get succeed. the first moment ı heared that they blame an arab ı just did laugh because they are so lazy and they are not that much skillful. this is not an insult this is just a fact because they have so much money so they didnot need any skills. they just eat drink, own and change islam. nothing else

you did ask my opinion so this is mine.besides we heared all the jewish people who work there did not come that day.if it is true why?

2006-12-20 08:42:36 · answer #5 · answered by zubeyde 3 · 0 1

I think the US should finish the job in Iraq, and then withdrawal from the "World Community" and become entirely self-sufficient. Collect all debts owed to the country, pay off all debts owed to other countries, and triple the tariff rates. Abolish NAFTA and stay the hell out of everyone else's business.

2006-12-20 08:31:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Ignorant hateful mentally disturbed people believe the 911conspiracy theory BS and they spit on those that lost loved ones on 911
loose change BS is only believed by retarded fact-less, reason-less anti-America always, pieces of fecal matter

2006-12-20 08:34:26 · answer #7 · answered by Deport all ILLEGAL Alien INVADER 3 · 0 0

I see answers among all of your questions

2006-12-20 08:29:01 · answer #8 · answered by Bruce W. 4 · 0 1

well they realy should be taking part in cleaning up this earth.

2006-12-20 12:52:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

that was sooooo stupid of the retards that did that

2006-12-20 08:28:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers