President Clinton was on the line of being impeached for having sexual relations w/someone and lying about it. Yet, George Bush has had this country in war, killing all of our troops, showed no love to the people in New Orleans, had something to do with the 9/11 attacks and is lying to our country about everything................but he's still our president.
2006-12-20 08:04:22 · 22 answers · asked by oohLa 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Okay I never said that Bush was responsible for the flood in New Orleans Im simply stating that he shouldve handled the situation better.
I think a lot of people should read up and investigate on some things instead of thinking that just b/c someone is the president that they are a saint.
Neither am I saying that Clinton was the best president in the world
2006-12-20 08:32:25 · update #1
O yea and I didn't vote for him
Did we forget that they were supposed to do a recount in Florida? Maybe he wasnt supposed to be the president in the first place.
2006-12-20 08:34:39 · update #2
Bush has lied to us and misled us. There is a representative in Georgia, Cynthia McKinney, who has talked about having him impeached. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/12/08/national/w152917S79.DTL What he is doing is illegal and he should be removed from office immediately.
2006-12-20 08:11:03 · answer #1 · answered by Juliet DeVaux 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Did Bush lie under oath (which is against the law)?
Can you prove that Bush lied and was not just misinformed about weapons of mass destruction? You can't. There is no proof. Without the proof, you cannot do too much. It is like saying "Well, that guy over there looks guilty of the crime so lets hang him." Find proof, real proof, and start from there.
Also, on the Katrina thing, why not include the governor of Louisiana and the Mayor of New Orleans with him. Those two could have taken gigantic steps to avoid the tragedy, yet they did not. The world has known for years that New Orleans would be a major catastrophe if a hurricane hit there. I remember watching a Discovery show about it in the late 90's. So why should the people who could have done something to get ready for it not be punished?
Also, once again, on the 9/11 thing. You have no proof of anything. NONE AT ALL!!! Can you not understand what the word "proof" is? Do you no understand what "evidence" is? If there was a man on trial and was found guilty using the "proof" that you have of Bush having anything to do with 9/11 then the world would be in an outrage. Find proof and go from there. If there was any real proof, there would be a newspaper that would have made it the front page by now.
Of course, why do I bother. You do not care about proof or evidence or real guilt. You want blood. It is all becoming a stupid witch trial.
ADDED SINCE YOU ADDED INFO:
Ok, you say we are not informed.
Tell us exactly what charges you think Bush should be impeached on and what evidence you have or know of to support those charges. Real evidence by the way, not speculation stuff.
ADDED YET ONCE AGAIN SINCE YOU ADDED STUFF:
The recount in Florida? You have got to be kidding me? Bush won Florida. Plain and simple. It was close, but he won. Gore would not accept it and kept pushing for more recounts and wanted to ignore the election law. The Supreme Court finally had to be called in to say that Gore had to obey the law. After that was all said and done, informal recounts came back the same and said that Bush won. There has never been a recount in Florida that said Gore won. You are not helping your debate prowness with bringing this one up.
2006-12-20 16:14:49 · answer #2 · answered by A.Mercer 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First Bush isn't the one killing our troops, it's the insurgents, and there is no proof he had anything to do with 9/11. All of that aside, I think that Bush has committed more impeachable offenses then Clinton. Like going to war on faulty intelligence, more spending + lowering of taxes, etc.
2006-12-20 16:32:45 · answer #3 · answered by greencoke 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No its not strange. President Clinton lied under oath, I believe. It has yet to be proved that President Bush has committed any impeachable crimes. That does not excuse his performance, but he is in the White House because he won the election. In 2004, he received a majority of the popular vote. Like it or not, the people voted him in and he has yet to do anything for him to be removed.
2006-12-20 16:12:15 · answer #4 · answered by skip 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Clinton was impeached for lying to a Grand Jury. This is a crime known as perjury. It doesn't matter if he lied about sex, you can not lie to a Grand Jury about anything.
George Bush has not lied or broken any laws. Even if you think he lied (which he didn't) it was not to a Grand Jury, and therfore not illegal. You can only impeach a President for a crime. Lying to the American people would be disgusting, but not a crime.
Once again, you prove how completely worthless our education system is.
2006-12-20 16:14:27 · answer #5 · answered by Aegis of Freedom 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, go get'em, only thing is you've got two years to do it and after that all your hate and non-sense will be all for nothing because he will be out of office. So hurry, go, waste your time, instead of trying to find a way to better your self, your community, and your country, yes revenge is the key!!
2006-12-20 16:10:33 · answer #6 · answered by jasonzbtzl 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
To my knowledge Bush hasn't lied under oath.
2006-12-20 16:35:23 · answer #7 · answered by Sean 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah, well if we start impeaching good people like Bush, what should we do with people like you?
2006-12-20 16:20:56 · answer #8 · answered by Curt 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
And direct friends of the Bin-laden family
2006-12-20 16:07:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
You forgot hurricanes, flooding, global warming, rain, snow, sun spots, liver spots and VD
Bush is responsible for all he planets ills isn't he?
F off punk
2006-12-20 16:09:35 · answer #10 · answered by Deport all ILLEGAL Alien INVADER 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋