English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Also, for Defense, would you choose Buffalo (home v. Tenn) or KC (at Oakland)?

For WR3, I'm starting Mark Clayton instead of Marcus Robinson. My theory--4 points are better than 2.

2006-12-20 08:03:08 · 7 answers · asked by Stuck in the Middle Ages 4 in Sports Fantasy Sports

7 answers

WR3, I think you got the right idea.

Defense - KC At Oakland. Oakland's offense is horrible and you'll end up with a couple of turnovers plus bonus on how few points Oakland scores.

None of those RB's is going to get a lot of receptions. Reggie Bush is the reception man in NO. Deuce Rushes. Ahman is way too inconsistent, so I wouldn't recommend him either. Alexander is your best bet because he'll get a few receptions here and there, but he'll still get you points for pounding it in on the goal line.

2006-12-20 08:11:55 · answer #1 · answered by s8n_spawn 3 · 0 0

ok for the running back situation i would choose duece because he
has the weakest defense this week and he also has 28 receptions. Green plays the Minnesota defense which gave up 5 yards to the whole miami team one week and only give up 55 yards per game against the run and they are nasty against the run. Alexander plays the san diego defense which is also great against the run, only one person(larry johnson) has gotten over 90 yards this season.

for the defense i would choose KC because Oakland offense is absolutely horrible. They only get 11 points per game and whoever they start at QB is horrible either way and give up sacks and ints. KC defense is the best bet by far. Tenn. is playing too well with young.

2006-12-20 08:21:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Shaun Alexander and Deuce. Sit green because he's too inconsistent. With Donald Driver pulling huge numbers as of late, Green isnt as useful as you might think. And for defence, it doesnt look like there's any stopping Vince Young, so play it safe, and play KC defense, especially against the terrible Raiders.

2006-12-20 09:44:44 · answer #3 · answered by granddana 2 · 0 0

Shaun Alexander and KC

2006-12-20 08:16:19 · answer #4 · answered by voidtillnow 5 · 0 0

not focusing on the worst taking section in halves because thats continually Tigers with Marshall, besides the indisputable fact that the worst mixture as a rule is the Panthers. Its fantastic that they extremely have good video games, Im not bagging the gamers taking section in ability what so ever, Luke Walsh & Wade Graham are large gamers, yet i imagine each crew desires an experienced, firstclass participant in both 5/8 or halfback and they basically dont have it, with Walsh taking section in basically some first grade video games and an 18 3 hundred and sixty 5 days previous, its basically not good, yet they are going good. and that i have study another solutions & favor to position in my options that i imagine Eels mixture of Mateo & Keating is possibly interior the right 5 superb halves mix as we talk, shame they are both injured yet they are both very proficient gamers who upload a lot to the crew. yet Knights halves rotation combos are basically fantastic lol bypass KNIGHTS!!!

2016-12-01 00:28:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

duece will get his receptions in the NO offense and KC because OAKLAND is the worst offensive team in the league

2006-12-20 08:43:37 · answer #6 · answered by shektor9 3 · 0 0

.

2006-12-20 08:06:12 · answer #7 · answered by ste_4114 1 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers