English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I didn't mean by this who killed him , i wanted to know which organization was behind his death?

2006-12-20 06:35:11 · 12 answers · asked by 3 in Arts & Humanities History

12 answers

Emy,

You have asked the key question, it is in other words, not so much who actually shot President Kennedy, but why, what was the motivation? Interestingly, no one has found a motive for Lee Harvey Oswald killing Kennedy, if he did. And it has been clearly established that JFK was shot by two gunmen, because of the bullets coming from different directions.

Now your question, what group of people were behind the assassination? Primarily, organized crime. Kennedy won the 1960 presidential campaign by an extremely narrow margin, and it is a fact the crime syndicate delivered the decisive votes. After this JFK appointed his brother, Robert, as attorney general. Inexplicablly, Robert Kennedy began an intense war, a real war, against organized crime. Mob leaders, such as Carlos Marcello, who previously not been prosecuted, suddenly faced jail. Marcello himself in reference to the President and Attorney General, said if you kill the head (JFK), you kill the tail (RFK and his anti-crime campaign). If the attorney general had been killed then President John Kennedy could have roused opposition to the Mafia.

As Marcello, who was in court facing jail, on the day of the assassination, correctly predicted that after his brother's death, under the new President Lyndon Johnson, Robert Kennedy would have no more will for the organized crime battle.

I have not examined this issue in a while, and therefore have only sketched the matter here. But please look at two reputable works by excellent journalists: Seymour Hersh, "The Dark Side of Camelot," and John Davis, "Mafia Kingfish: Carlos Marcello and the Assassination of John F. Kennedy."

2006-12-20 08:58:56 · answer #1 · answered by Rev. Dr. Glen 3 · 1 0

It's really a complete shameful government we have. Anyone that thinks it's a free country is so naive. We now, starting then, live in one of the most corrupt nations in the world. Everything is a lie. You can't trust ANY politicians. Our government is ran by the forces that be. The wealthy. The most powerful group of people in the world. The Federal Reserve. What they say, is what goes. Period. Until we can get a president and a congress to stop the corruption and reset the standards of our nation, which would be a government of the people, by the people and for the people, like our forfathers tried so desperately to do, we all remain puppets.

2014-07-04 14:39:19 · answer #2 · answered by Randy 1 · 0 0

President Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas, at 12:30 p.m. CST on November 22, 1963, while on a political trip through Texas. He was struck by at least two bullets. Texas Governor John Connally, seated ahead of Kennedy, was also struck by a bullet, but survived.

Lee Harvey Oswald was arrested in a theatre about 80 minutes after the assassination and charged at 7:00 p.m. for killing a Dallas policeman by "murder with malice", and also charged at 11:30 p.m. for the murder of Kennedy (there being no charge for "assassination" of a president at that time). Oswald denied shooting anyone; he claimed that he was being set up as a "patsy", and that photographs of him holding the alleged murder weapon were fabrications. Oswald was fatally shot less than two days later in a Dallas police station by Jack Ruby, in front of live TV cameras. Consequently, Oswald's guilt or innocence was never determined in a court of law, and some critics (such as New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison, and conspiracy researchers Mark Lane and David Lifton) contend that Oswald was not involved at all and that he was framed.

Five days after Oswald was killed, President Lyndon B. Johnson created the Warren Commission—chaired by Chief Justice Earl Warren—to investigate the assassination. It concluded that Oswald was the lone assassin. A later investigation in the 1970s by the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) also concluded that Oswald was the assassin, but that there was a "probable conspiracy" as well. [14]

The assassination was captured on Super 8 mm film, most famously by Dallas dress manufacturer Abraham Zapruder. The film shows President Kennedy raising his hands in front of his neck, most likely in reaction to an initial bullet striking him in the back, evidenced by the holes in his jacket and shirt. Shortly after, it shows the effect of the second, fatal blow which forces his head backwards. There is visible blood spatter, and then the President slumps to his left onto the seat.

You could get more information from the link below...

2006-12-20 21:58:00 · answer #3 · answered by catzpaw 6 · 1 0

I agree with "Jim". JFK's father made his money through illegal alcohol and was connected somehow back then during The Prohibition times, with the Mafia. He got the Chicago mob to get Kennedy elected through their connections in Illinois (which I think topped the race). THEN, Kennedy turned around and appointed his brother, Bobby, as Attn. General. Bobby started off
then, after the Mafia!!! Edgar G. Hoover never messed with the Mafia, but instead went after Pretty Boy Floyd, etc., etc. I think he even claimed that there was no mob. Anyway, when Bobby went after the mobs, they took retribution on JFK and had him killed. I can't make that connection with Oswald, but....Then, of course, Sirhan, another "lone gunman", killed Bobby! I can't make that connection, either. BUT, both Bobby and JFK had relations with Marilyn Monroe. I think that she was going to blow the whistle on them--and I think that the Old Kennedy clan had her killed, and made it look like suicide.-----I'm not a conspiracy buff, either.

2006-12-20 07:15:43 · answer #4 · answered by Martell 7 · 2 0

At this element, you will come across an cyber web version of the Zapruder action picture that has been improved to the element that it leaves little doubt Kennedy became struck from in the back of by a single bullet. you may surely see his head flow forward for one physique in the past it snaps returned, and he is going into convulsions that proceed till he disappears from sight. the pinnacle snapped returned on the beginning up of a team of gross convulsions of his entire physique - the consequences of one million/2 his strategies being blown away. you will discover him writhing in a gentle rhythm because of the fact the vehicle speeds away. At one element his hips have risen as much as the sills of the vehicle door. he's flopping around like a fish in a ship. A bullet from the front does not reason that. the 2d bullet thought is ridiculous. because of the fact the mist is clearing after his head exploded, one little cloud of mist lingered by the edge of his head for one physique. After seeing the dramatic results of the bullet strike from in the back of, it extremely is preposterous to think of that little wisp of mist shows a 2d result. I have not have been given any doubt that there became one gunman who fired the deadly shot. If there have been others, there's no evidence to instruct it.

2016-12-30 17:11:02 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Lee Harvey Oswald.

2006-12-20 08:45:14 · answer #6 · answered by Megan Leggett 2 · 0 1

Check Google!

2006-12-20 06:42:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Aliens

2006-12-20 06:43:38 · answer #8 · answered by Huh? 3 · 0 2

Nobody knows... it's all a big conspiracy theory. It was either the Mafia or the CIA.

2006-12-20 07:14:37 · answer #9 · answered by 3lixir 6 · 1 0

Probably the CIA.

2006-12-20 06:46:50 · answer #10 · answered by desdemona othello 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers