Since they have no fear (not to mention valore), this will end the Civil War in Iraq, wouldn't you think? Just seeing their faces will be enough!
2006-12-20 06:09:43 · 22 answers · asked by twowords 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Ah Ha... if you can't answer...
2006-12-20 06:14:55 · update #1
I think you might want to lighten up a bit. And Yes, I do hear troops complaining. Why is it that a man who's never seen War has any place in running one?
2006-12-20 06:16:28 · update #2
Yes, maybe then they could come up with a solution of what to do in Iraq. Don't stop with Bush put him and his Administration and Congress on the front lines. Then maybe they will quit stalling and come up with a strategy.
2006-12-20 09:19:22 · answer #1 · answered by j 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As reported, if the two have been impeached and convicted concurrently, it may be Speaker Pelosi. in spite of the shown fact that, if Bush replaced into bumped off first, then Cheney may be president and can have the potential to nominate a vice chairman who may be in line in the past right here. If Cheney have been impeached and convicted first, Bus ought to hire a clean vice chairman who may be in the past Pelosi. in spite of the shown fact that, those VPs might in basic terms have the potential to take the presidency in the event that they have been shown via the senate first, an no longer likely occurance if the president and vice chairman have been being convicted via them.
2016-10-15 07:51:58 · answer #2 · answered by trinkle 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You obviously do not know anything about war.
Was Clinton on the front line in Bosnia or the Presian Gulf War? No.
Was George H. W. Bush on the front line in the Persian Gulf War? No.
Was Woodrow Wilson on the front line in World War I? No.
Was Franklin Delano Roosevelt on the front line in World War II? No.
Was Harry S. Truman on the fron line in the Korean War? No.
2006-12-20 06:19:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hey two words I have two words also. BILL CLINTON! Why should a man that protested the US in Russia ever been allowed to be a President? I noticed when he sent troops to Somalia, or Bosnia him and al gore were not on the front lines either. Also Chelsea where was her @ss?
2006-12-20 06:25:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Why not send John Kerry, or John Mertha, they are so experienced? Oh and let Al Gore play war corespondent and Bill Clinton can play the part of war protester. Do I sound as silly as you do yet??????????
2006-12-20 08:10:53 · answer #5 · answered by rosi l 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Like most of the "Boys" on here. they don't have what it takes to serve on the front lines......Hell! No ! don't send them over there, the "men and Women" over there have enough to do without having to "baby-sit " a bunch of yellow-backs....
2006-12-20 06:16:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
How many Presidents go to the front lines? Did you feel the same about Clinton in Bosnia, or is this just an anti-Bush thing?
Your ignorance is astonishing.
2006-12-20 06:12:01 · answer #7 · answered by Jadis 6 · 6⤊ 3⤋
It's the Commander In Chiefs job to call troops to fight for the country as he sees fit you nit. You don't hear our troops complaining. In fact, they're fighting for your right to say stupid crap like this. Get a life half wit.
2006-12-20 06:14:10 · answer #8 · answered by mojojo66 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
What's 'valore'? You mean 'valor'?
It makes no sense for a modern day Commander in Chief to be in the middle of a conflict.
2006-12-20 06:12:32 · answer #9 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 7⤊ 3⤋
Tell George Bush here:
http://www.havetextwithme.com
He'll answer all your questions!
2006-12-20 06:19:10 · answer #10 · answered by George W. Bush 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋