yes, if it's a " no contact " order...than it runs BOTH WAYS......
Your sister-in-law should also have " NO CONTACT "...with him....
if she's initiating contact, and you can prove it......than you can get her for violating her own order....
but, you have to call the police, make a report...and then, take that proof back to the court that issued the order in the first place.
Once, for me....they " vacated " an order I had against me, when they realized it was not me causing the trouble, but the person who had gotten the order against me..
everything was dismissed and wiped clean.
good luck to you and your brother......she sounds like a winner.
2006-12-20 06:01:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Campbell Gramma 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Anyway of communication directly or indirectly is considered communication, which in return is called a breach. Be carefull!!If the other party finds out there is 3 way going on, They may report it and then that person maybe looking into more serious trouble...Breach of restraining order or breach of probation.
Good Luck!
2006-12-20 14:10:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Pete 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes! Communication through a third party is a violation. Now, depending on the type of order, the remedy is either civil contempt or can be jail. Your brother should contact his attorney to decide what he would like to do.
2006-12-20 13:58:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Angry Daisy 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Any contact with the person would be off limits. Having someone three-way a call would be against the restraining order.
2006-12-20 13:59:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ginger P 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, and it also violates eavesdropping laws. The mutual friend is also guilty of conspiracy to violate a restraining order and is party to the eavesdropping violation.
Seek the advise of counsel, but I would advise you report it to the police and consider filing civil charges against your husband and his friend.
2006-12-20 13:56:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by JSpielfogel 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
voluntary contact with the person with the TPO sworn against by the respondent can invalidate the order.
2006-12-20 14:22:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It sounds like she is violating her own order. Your brother should probably tell his lawyer about her actions, and be very careful about who he talks to. God speed to you, and your brother!
2006-12-20 13:58:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by mojojo66 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes!
2006-12-20 14:04:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by purplemrskitty 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I doubt it is illegal. He should just watch what he says. She sounds pretty conniving.
2006-12-20 14:13:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-12-20 13:58:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋