should killing animals for meat be banned?

Question

i think meat shoudl be banned as it is cruel to animals and i u disagree u r selfish.

Answer 1

When you think about it, you are correct. Yet with that said, it will never happen.

Answer 2

When you kill any animal for meat, remember that it stays dead. All animals should have just as much right to live as humans do. There are so many other kinds of food that contains the nutrients found in meat. They are probably healthier too. Think about it: If you were a cow or a pig, would you want to die just to end up on some plate having your flesh torn from its bones? Yes, carnivores do eat other animals in nature, but as humans we have a choice to live meat-free.

Answer 3

I don't think killing animals for meat should be banned. It's not cruel if done right. Kosher methods of killing a cow are far more humane than many of the factories where animals are pulled apart alive and the beef gets lots of toxins in it as a result. The reason is the cow's throat is slit and they bleed to death slowly, rather than being zapped and pulled apart.

I think, to a degree, that you are selfish for trying to force people to be vegetarians!

Answer 4

I think you are being too EMO about this dude:
A Cattle Concept
Beef cattle are an important part of the food chain, yet misinformed people will tell you how much grain and water we waste by eating meat instead of grain. Let's look at the truth.

Cattle are ruminants, which means they can digest things we can't. They turn inedible roughage into highly-digestible meat. This meat is a complete protein source, is a good source of B vitamins, creatine, zinc, and various other nutrients. Two thirds of the land in the world needs forage vegetation to prevent erosion, and only ruminants can harvest that forage. Are you starting to form a mental picture, here? Good!

Answer 5

So according to your question killing an animal just for fun and leaving the carcus lying there would be okay. I will let you slide on that oversight I sure you didn't mean to leave it open like that. But there is a real reason to kill animals for food. Overpopulation of certain species of animals.

Overpopulation, causes shortages of food in their habitat which cause even more death and suffering of animals not to mention diseases that can spread to humans. Thining out herds can protect a species better than leaving them be. Then if we thin out the herd to protect them why let the meat go to waste. It is more cruel to kill just for killing sake than it is to have a purpose for the killed.

Well, anyway I expect the usual if a human were to kill another human to thin out the population then eat it would you consider that cruel ... blah blah blah ... argument. To that I will say it is completely different because humans are superior ... blah blah blah. They you say HA, see you are selfish ... blah blah blah.

To save time with all of that back and forth I will admit I am a meateater who thinks humans are superior to animals and if that makes me selfish I guess I am.

Answer 6

i do no longer think of we could desire to consistently ban meat. some people p.c. to no longer consume meat (i'm assuming you do no longer) and that's their determination, even with the undeniable fact that, some people DO p.c. to consume meat. something that people tend to forget approximately, oddly adequate, is that we are nonetheless, in certainty, animals. Animals consume animals. Banning meat for people could be like banning moose from wolves. besides, worry-unfastened cattle DO in certainty have a inhabitants interior the wild, yet a separate, non-domesticated branch. working example, the javelina (wild boar) as against a family individuals pig. If memory serves me, they proportion a worry-unfastened ancestor yet family individuals pigs have been bred to a factor the place it may be extra merciless to place them back interior the wild and that they could in all probability have an outstanding shorter lifespan than the reliable (albeit short) life they have on the farm. If I set a pig off into the wild, it may well be taken down by utilising a mountain lion or something by utilising the subsequent morning. If, for some reason, there have been no predators, it may basically starve to dying or die of dehydration. If I tossed a poultry into the wild, its lack of ability to fly could deliver it on a directly direction to the way forward for dodo birds. additionally, meat is a necessity for protein. i comprehend there are different sources of protein yet meat is decrease priced (have you ever offered protein powder? That stuff gets so costly after a on an analogous time as!) and we could desire to bear in suggestions that little ones in low-earnings households want protein, too, and that they are able to't get it if we've not got decrease priced meat sources like poultry and hamburger. And on the concern of "how will we justify killing cows" we can justify it by utilising the two going as much as my previous factor approximately letting all of our dairy cows run amok till they get taken down by utilising coyotes or we could pass as much as my factor much extra back approximately us being animals. that's the foodchain and that's been around because of the fact the commencing up of time. people have been initially basically yet another style of prey for larger predators, yet our suggestions potential quite did us a prefer and we now dominate. even with the undeniable fact that, it remains under pressure out in our biology to pass after what's under us on the foodchain, which happens to be issues like birds, fish, cows and vegetation. And, you comprehend, savage as i'm going to sound for asserting this section, meat is distinctly darn scrumptious.

Answer 7

Instead of worrying about the animals being killed for meat why don't you worry about humans? You and PETA should be more concerned about day laborers in Iraq being blown up by suicide bombers, refugees being killed by janjuweed militia in Darfur, and civilians being killed in Palestine by rival factions. And you are worried about cruel and unhumane treatment of animals? Why aren't you worried about ripping a carrot out of the ground and eating it raw!?

Answer 8

its not the killing them thats bad...we will all be worm food someday...its the circle of life.

what SHOULD be banned is the cruel living conditions used to store the animals...

Answer 9

How else are you going to get the meat if you don't kill them? Are we to just wait around until the die of old age?

Answer 10

What's better, a life cut short or no life at all?

Without the meat industry, millions and millions of cows, pigs, and other animals would never be born.

Answer 11

I agree. It is much better to continue the slaughter of our animals on the roadways. Sarcasm.

Do you know the extent of property damage caused annually by hitting deer on the highways and roads of the US?