2006-12-20 04:41:54 · 11 answers · asked by silvyca 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
I don't know. The probowl voting this year is messed up. Merriman making it in after his steriod suspension. Romo after only playing half a season. And Josh Brown, the guy who has kicked 4 game winning FG's gets beat by a guy who has not kicked a single FG over 50 yards this year. Come on! That's crap
2006-12-20 07:43:57 · answer #1 · answered by fish guy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why shouldn't he be able to go to pro bowl. hes one of the top LB in the NFL, isnt that what pro bowl is about to send the best. his steroid use wasnt intentional. And to compare T.O. to Merriman is a joke, T.O. is self centered and only looks out for T.O. Merriman is a good guy, he does alot for his community and else where. If all you see is a blown out of proportion story of steroid use, over the skills and talent this guy brings to the field, you dont have any right to talk sports.
2006-12-20 05:00:06 · answer #2 · answered by mex_angel18 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The 4-activity suspension develop right into a symbolic gesture, familiar of professional activities leagues customarily; a PR flow. That way no individual can actually say that the league did no longer some thing, and excellent gamers can nevertheless convey contained in the crowds and characteristic their jerseys bought to the youngsters who opt for to adhere to of their footsteps. A slap on the wrist, and extremely cynical fairly frankly.
2016-11-27 23:01:10 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because he leads the league in sacks after only playing in 10 of the games. The tainted supplement theory is beginning to hold water, he is in the process of sueing the supplement company responsible. Plus he's actually been better on the field since he's been off the juice.
2006-12-20 05:12:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he tested positive back in august, since then, he hasn't been taking the supplement, so all this season, he has been steroid free, and he played an awesome season, regardless of the suspension
2006-12-20 15:36:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes he deserves to go to the pro bowl. Like some other people have said, it wasn't steroids, just a banned substance. I bet you couldn't take a piss test right now & pass the NFL stringent tests. Did you know if you have to much water in your urine, you'll fail the NFL DRUG TEST.
2006-12-20 05:44:58 · answer #6 · answered by Fred P 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Simple, he's a beast with out without the roids, if you consider otherwise, lets see you go against him. Merriman just flat out owns.
2006-12-20 05:19:29 · answer #7 · answered by squad9_7 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I totally agree with you. I mean sure he CLAIMED he didn't do it intentionally but isn't intresting how he dropped his appeal right after one game. You know how he just seemed to be doing it so that it would work to his favor as far as the schedule. Personally I think he should have had to serve from the game after the appeal would have been.
2006-12-20 05:25:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
because he leads the NFL in sacks!!!
what would his stats be if he did play in those 4 games...
and it was a tainted supplement, not intentional steriod use.
2006-12-20 04:54:17 · answer #9 · answered by FIGHT ON! 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
good point... TO gets shafted because people simply dont like him. But this guy goes and is known to have violated NFL policy.
Seems odd.
2006-12-20 04:44:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋