Hitler was a volunteer in WW1 and a certified war hero
Bush is a deserter and a certified coward
Hitler developed a huge succesful economic miracle
Bush has bankrupted the USA
Hitller was well versed in world History
Bush does not know how to spell the word
Hitler was an unfailingly polite man
Bush is a impolite rude bully who's behavior is so bad he was photographed giving the finger to a protestor who dared to disagree with him.
Hitler told the truth and kept promises
Bush doesn't know the defenition of truth and keeps no promises.None!
So the pundits who wish to compare Bush with Hitler are totally outrageous, but not for the reason their critics usually cite. It is an egegious insult to the memory of Adolph Hitler to compare the Fuher of the Third Reich to the Arab slaughtering blood thirsty texas redneck who currently resides in our white house
2006-12-20 03:34:02 · 21 answers · asked by Tommy Oliver 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Nice speech, now is there a question in here someplace? Nope I sure don't find one...yawn....
2006-12-20 03:39:15 · answer #1 · answered by WelshKiwi 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I agree that Bush has been a disappointment as President.
I'm not sure that all those things are absolutely true, but Clinton did a better job in most of those areas. For instance we are not really bankrupt, but our debt is enormous.
Please remember though that Hitler slaughtered 13 million people.
That equates to New York, or to both LA & Chicago! More than 3 Houston Metro areas. A lot of people.
Estimated numbers fall around these amounts
6 million jews
2.5 million gypsies
3 million Jehovah's Witnesses
more than 1 million homosexuals
and 1 million others.
And no proof was required, if you were labeled such, you were gone.
Bush , in my view is not a good President, but to imply that Hitler was a better leader is a very scary thing.
Hitler was, at times, very charming, but evil people often are, and he was the personification of evil.
2006-12-20 03:45:54 · answer #2 · answered by rumbler_12 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
While I agree Mr Bush has his failings, to compare him with Adolph Hitler is an insult to all humanity. Adolph Hitler was a madman and a murderer of humanity. He was directly responsible for plunging the world into war, causing millions of deaths. He set out to wipe a race, the Jewish, from the face of the Earth . How can anyone possibly compare anyone else with Hitler. By the way, Merry Christmas.
2006-12-20 03:51:58 · answer #3 · answered by brainstorm 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bush and Hitler are the same from the standpoint that they both failed to show minimal human dignity towards other people; both were instrumental in the death of so many innocent people.
Other than this similarity, they are different, you are right. Hiler's language was German, Bush's (possibly) english. Hitler had funny mustache, Bush none. Etc. etc.
You know what, people do not care about those traits. To the tortured, dead and alive, and to the eyewitnesses, it is the brutality that horrifies. And in that regard, I would assume, people who compare the two, compares them and finds no dissimilarity between the two evils who wreaked so much havoc in this world.
Your point, intelligently said, is very well taken. :)
2006-12-23 03:01:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hitler also had syphyllis and was vegetarian.
As for an economic miracle in Germany at the time, you could have picked a random 11th grader and they couldn't have done worse, given the situation at hand.
And Bush has never, and will never set out to exterminate an entire group of people.
2006-12-20 03:43:29 · answer #5 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Bush was not a deserter, show some proof.
2)Hitler did not fix the economy but rather he blamed it on Jews and Christians.
3) The Us economy is doing fine and Bush did not take money from SSI to accomplish it.
4)Bush graduated from one of the nations top collages so I bet he can spell.
5)It is not to polite to kill off millions of people just because you don't agree with them or you need a scape goat.
6)Bush keeps his promises too or we would not be in Iraq.
Why must people spew off this type of unfounded crap. Bush has some legit downfalls so please do some research and post the real ones and then people may give you some credibility.
2006-12-20 03:43:26 · answer #6 · answered by joevette 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
WHAT!? What kind of question is this; it praises Hitler, a man who whether people want to admit it or not, was a mastermind of things 10, 20 times worse than this charade in Iraq.
2006-12-20 03:51:16 · answer #7 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes, for ppl who have studied world history in depth, there are some disturbing similarities.
IE, his belief that the masses could be easily controlled by propaganda. While that is true, it is not eithical but Hitler and Bush both believe that since they CAN do it that makes it ok. The 'since it's possible, it's acceptable' mentality.
IE, there is also a lot of similarity in their 'supremacy' way of thinking. Hitler literally believed his race was supreme therefore giving him the right to dictate to and occupy other countries. Bush believes his religion is supreme therefore he truly believes he is doing GOD's will therefore giving him the right to dictate to and occupy other countries. He has been quoted before as saying that btw. He also has been quoted as saying only Christians (accepting Jesus as your saviour) will go to Heaven.
IE, then there is his basic executive power belief much like Hitler where he believes the president should have the ultimate authority and be able to overrule congress at any given time.
IE then there is the similarity of disrespecting human liberties. I don't even have to explain that one.
There is more but thats enough typing.
2006-12-20 03:38:36 · answer #8 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 2⤊ 6⤋
beachbum you can find similarities between any leader of any country. they both believed propaganda CAN work? who doesnt believe that? supremacy? would any leader of any organization, business, anything NOT think they are the best? does the pope not think that catholics are not the best come on. overrule congress?? yes they can and then the congress can overrule him. you know that checks and balances thing. similarites of human liberties? since when is killing people and listening to them on a phone comparable?...... give me a break.
2006-12-20 03:41:23 · answer #9 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hitler murdered six million Jews, suppressed his people and built economic success on the back of brutality, forced labor and theft.
Hitler never won an election. he took power by having his enemies murdered.
Your post is facetious and offensive.
2006-12-20 03:38:50 · answer #10 · answered by Ak23566 3 · 5⤊ 2⤋