2006-12-20 02:57:59 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
no...let him do it more consistently..
2006-12-24 02:45:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion, Jackson is just above average as a running back, hardly a franchise player. He has no moves to speak of and is just a plow ahead type of runner. He is typical of the type of player that the Rams invest their time and money on. Not really good enough to take the team to another level. Good as a backup, though.
2006-12-20 11:31:14 · answer #2 · answered by turkey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he was last year, was just splitting time with faulk till he got injured, he is a mirror image of faulk, not the best "running" back, but one of the best over all backs in the NFL being a threat out of the back field to catch as well as run it down your throwt
2006-12-20 11:16:49 · answer #3 · answered by dom_parnell 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Noone on the Rams is the real deal.
GO BEARS!
2006-12-20 11:54:34 · answer #4 · answered by Chad 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hes gonna be a good one for a few years to come
2006-12-20 11:24:18 · answer #5 · answered by thuglife 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes he is!
2006-12-20 11:01:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋