Why didn't Bush and the government pin 9-11 on Saddam and Iraqi's instead of Osama?
2006-12-20 02:47:35 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Excellent point, not that the conspiracy fruit loops will ever acknowledged that you are right. It would have been far easier to plant WMD's in Iraq and finger Saddam for the Trade Towers attacks. Common sense is hardly ever introduced into this discussion.
2006-12-21 05:10:16 · answer #1 · answered by kfc13571 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
THANK YOU!!! I have been saying that for years!
Also, if Iraq was all a hoax, why didn't Bush & co PLANT WMDs in Iraq?
You know, if people said Bush was mistaken and not up to the job, they would get a lot more support than they do when they say he's evil, greedy, a liar, etc.
They paint themselves into a corner, and lose the argument.
People are upset at the handling of the war, and it showed in the elections.
But I think the Democrats could have won in 2004 if they didn't give in the the Michael Moore kook crowd.
2006-12-20 02:49:14 · answer #2 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Jesus guy. Are you residing lower than a rock? for sure the authorities replaced into in the back of 9/11. Who else replaced into it? Arabs who ought to somewhat fly Cessnas? Who under no circumstances even flew the planes they supposedly hijacked and redirected with out radar or any training? there's a reason the tale makes 0 experience. the authorities does not care about the 9/11 truth because they don't ought to. They administration the media and see you later because the media under no circumstances mentions it, it received't exist for ninety% of the inhabitants. that is a testomony to how stupid and brainwashed we are. i will guess you do not even keep in mind that a number of those 'college shootings' are thoroughly staged. Dozens of them. just about each and each one interior the previous 2 years. Yeah, welcome to truth.
2016-12-01 00:14:22 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As the towers were burning, Rumsfeld wrote a memo asking if there was a way to pin this on Saddam.
2006-12-20 03:47:40 · answer #4 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They did try. To justify the war in Iraq. Now they are playing the fear of terrorist card by claiming if we pull out it will create a terrorist breeding ground all while the administrations friends and family get wealthy from defense contracts. Face it the longer this war continues the richer they get.
2006-12-20 02:56:47 · answer #5 · answered by roscodog 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He tried, many morons out there still think there is a link. Cheney as recent as the last six months tried again to link Iraq and Osama on Meet the Press.
Pathetic.
Equally as pathetic is Kurt's assertion of what Liberal values are.
2006-12-20 02:50:34 · answer #6 · answered by vertical732 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well put...
But the conspiracy theorists are still looking for the Time Traveling Delorian to go back in time to prove all their theories.
2006-12-20 02:50:08 · answer #7 · answered by El Bubba 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Did he really have to considering we went to war without any evidence of collusin between Osama and Saddam. So, to answer your question they didn't have to.
2006-12-20 02:52:56 · answer #8 · answered by Frank R 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
and you don't think pictures of terrorist training camps with poster boards of the trade towers and empty airplanes to train on, wasn't an attempt to do just that??
if it wasn't for the world human league, and the 9/11 commission stating Iraq had nothing to do with it, they were going to do just that!
but as far as most of that 9/11 conspiracy crap, it is just that...crap.
the only thing the Bush admin did to cause 9/11 is enable it to happen by trimming Clinton's anti-terror bill, and not doing anything until they were caught with their pants down on September 11, 2001.
2006-12-20 02:52:48 · answer #9 · answered by jj 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
OK One more time
The Saudi's in the Mosque with the Airplane.
Go big Red Go
2006-12-20 02:50:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋