A-false.
B-convincing.
C-powerful.
D-inconclusive.
2006-12-20 02:33:55 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
d
2006-12-20 02:37:10 · answer #1 · answered by fancyname 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How could you prove a statement true AND false?
Could you mean True OR False?
If there isn't enough evidence, it's D inconclusive.
2006-12-20 02:48:43 · answer #2 · answered by Richard E 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm going with D-Inconclusive. Not knowing the venue for the evidence nor what the evidence is I will give a general response.
If something is neither "evidence of" nor "insufficent" there is no conclusion to its proof. Proof of what? It has not been established either way, therefore, it is "inconclusive".
2006-12-20 02:38:50 · answer #3 · answered by handjive1228 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
D. Inconclusive.
2006-12-20 03:01:04 · answer #4 · answered by Soul saviour 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evidence that is insufficient to prove something is inconclusive.
2006-12-20 05:12:00 · answer #5 · answered by jayelthefirst 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
D) INCONCLUSIVE
in•con•clu•sive
Pronunciation: (in"kun-klOO'siv), [key]
—adj.
1. not conclusive; not resolving fully all doubts or questions: inconclusive evidence.
2. without final results or outcome: inconclusive experiments.
2006-12-20 02:38:30 · answer #6 · answered by ••Mott•• 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
E - None of the above
It is always the case that it is not possible to prove a statement true and false.
2006-12-20 04:34:15 · answer #7 · answered by curious 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
D
im not very sure on why you asked this seemingly obvious question
are you
A-stupid
B-not very smart
C-bored
or D- RETARTED!
2006-12-20 03:05:16 · answer #8 · answered by soccrdude113 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
D- Inconclusive.
Or maybe it's just truthiness.
2006-12-20 03:18:29 · answer #9 · answered by corvis_9 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
D.
2006-12-20 02:39:26 · answer #10 · answered by Joe 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋