What purpose dose the british royal family serve in the 21st century?

Answer 1

Representatives of the UK

Answer 2

Its an outdated institution. It serves very little purpose. It is also a moral affront - in the 21st Century surely we can move on form the old ways in which the accident of your birth gave you power and status. Too many of the Royal Family are pretty awful role models - if we all behaved like them it would be a sorry old world!

Answer 3

The British Royal Family is symbolic of the unity of England . The allegiance the Britisher ow towards the Queen is not some royal dictat but the symbolic voluntary acceptance of unity of interests of the English people.The Royal Family has also constructively responded to the changed perception and maintained their dignity. People have shown indulgence even in some unbecoming behaviour of members of the royal family like that of Kind Edward VII in the Ninteen Century, King Edward VIII in mid-20th century and more recently that of the Prince.They could as well have impeached them for unbecoming behaviour and in fact abolished kingship but the Britishes who are almost notoriously conservative has held fast to the royalty.

Answer 4

the perfect element is that without them, one hundred's or maybe one thousand's of trip makers,(the two worldwide and family members) does not stand outdoors Buckingham Palace on a daily basis. They, spend money interior the capital on centers and lodging. to no longer point out upload on excursions and souvenirs. in spite of the shown fact that, there's a cost to pay in protection, maintenance trip etc that the tax payer ought to pay. for my area i've got faith they generate better than they value if we are basically speaking in chilly economic words. (see under). upload to that the visits, charities (Prince's have faith to illustrate trains dissafected youths for paintings, builds low priced housing for first time purchasers, promotes environmental subjects etc.) and different goodwill they sell, i'm involved in them. Philip Howard interior the British Monarchy interior the 20 th Century: ''in case you upload the hid expenditures of the monarchy, and subtract the hid salary, you arrive on the tip that such arithmetic will never be well worth the calculation.'' WITH AN ANNUAL budget of a few $375 billion, Britain can surely have sufficient money the royals, despite their value. however the willingness of the country to p.c.. up the tab is in line with some unstated assumptions. As Anthony Sampson places it interior the changing Anatomy of england: ''The magic ((of the monarchy)) has consistently been greater contrived than it appeared, and in the back of it lies a real looking commercial good purchase: The taxpayers and their governments are arranged to subsidize the royal family members, provided that they practice themselves sufficiently and don't overstep their political limits.''

Answer 5

Absolutely none they are a parasitic mob, Monarchy should have ended with Charles 1st they could not survive if they were turned loose to make a living, they couldnt hold a job in Macdonalds.
Why dont my fellow countrymen chuck this useless dysfuncional bunch out and become citizens instead of subjects
As for being a tourist attraction , what tourist ever see,s them? and France, with NO royals gets far more tourists than the U.K

Answer 6

The British Royal Family serves no useful purpose.
They just cost us long suffering taxpayers a bundle everytime they decide to visit.

Answer 7

The same prupose as the average "President" serves. A Head of State - someone to put their face on coinage and serve as a focus for the nation.

Do you really think a President would be any different? They'd still cost a lot of money. I for one don't want to live under President Blair.

Answer 8

The same purpose as any head of state. All country's have a head of state, usually some blo-dy lying toad of a political feathering there own nest. Our lot feathered theirs hundreds of years ago so don't screw us quite so much. Its easier to pay for the upkeep than shell out for new one every 4-5 years.

Answer 9

Well given that the current queen is head of state ( in name only ) and the head of the Anglican Church, defender of the faith and all that, I don't think they do that bad a job as ambassadors (when did a royal visit to US ever end up with us at war with the middle east).
Foreigners love them and flock to our shores to come and see the pomp and ceremony as it has been abolished in so many other countries.

Keep them, they bring in more revenue than they spend.

Answer 10

The queen has the power to dissolve parliament. With all the alleged corruption going on, I'm glad that this possibility exists. They also do a huge amount for charity and bring in loads of tourism. And they do make for entertainment every so often!

Answer 11

the Royal family represents the UK . some people mistakenly think they are paying for them with their tax , which is completely wrong they get nothing from the taxpayer they are payed expenses from the revenue from land that belonged to them and was taken from them by the government of the time . if the governments profits from them were taken into account it would work out that the queen pays about 99% tax on her assets they are this countries history and a part of our heritage .it amazes me that its the same people who whinge about immigrants taking away our identity that put no value on the identity that we have