2006-12-20 02:00:42 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I thought it was spelled Reagan but the stupid spell check led my astray
2006-12-20 02:04:02 · update #1
Hell No, at least Regan could form full sentences. Bush can't even do that much. When Regan spoke, people listened. When Bush speaks, people either fall a sleep or count the seconds when he is going to shut up because he talks so slowly and in fragmented sentences.
2006-12-20 11:03:24 · answer #1 · answered by Curious 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No - absolutley not.
President Reagan revived the economy, cut taxes, reduced the deficit and rolled back the state to set people free.
Along with Mrs Thatcher, he defeated Communism and brought hope to hundreds of millions of people enslaved in the Soviet Union.
He united his country and built bridges with decent Democrats who shared his vision for a strong and proud America.
Such was his popularity, he won 49 states - narrowly losing in just Minnesota (Walter Mondale's home state). When did the GOP last win NY, MA and IL ?
He was loved by the military and respected throughout the world for his decency, integrity and honesty.
America, and the world, will not see the likes of him again.
God bless President Reagan.
2006-12-20 10:06:44 · answer #2 · answered by Ak23566 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. Reagan won the Cold War by imposing economic sanctions, something that Bush is oppposed to. Reagan also had a hand in tearing down the Berlin Wall. Bush wants to build a wall, right here in the US...
2006-12-20 10:03:41 · answer #3 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Reagan was the best president ever. Bush is up there, but not better than Reagan.
2006-12-20 10:04:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
This is a funny sort of question. I have a neocon friend (yup, one neocon friend) who I've asked this several times. His s/n is ReaganiteRampage, so you know he's into Reaganomics and such, but he said that most neocons and Reaganites like Bush more. Personally, I think both of them can suckle on the teat of financial warmongering and fill baby bottles with oil...
2006-12-20 10:09:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not a chance. At least during office Ronald helped the economy with his supply side economics. He's definitely the lesser of two evils. Bush has to be the worst president of all time. (They even said so in an article in The Washington Post last, ummm, Monday i think it was)
2006-12-20 10:04:18 · answer #6 · answered by Zack 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Are you kidding? Bush sucks. At least Reagan attemted to clean up drugs, and Bush has never made a good movie.
2006-12-20 10:07:48 · answer #7 · answered by ladyoftherrlake 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
not even close. Ronnie was our greatest president, and if anyone here knew their history they would know Bush is not our worst president (not even in the bottom 5).
2006-12-20 10:04:32 · answer #8 · answered by jefferson 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not quite, and it's spelled Reagan.
2006-12-20 10:02:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
why would you even ask such a question. Right now at 9;04 am on dec 20th he is now telling us the war in Iraq is not going good when all along before this he was trying to convince us we were making progress.
My vote goes to being the WORST PRESIDENT IN AMERICAN HISTORY
2006-12-20 10:05:46 · answer #10 · answered by apostle1938 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋