tw*at
2006-12-20 01:33:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by puresatin 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
So you are saying that you would rather want a child brought into this world even though the parents wont love him/her or want anything to do with it...dont you think that is more sad then abortion?
you shouldnt say anything that you dont know about
2006-12-20 01:35:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Candy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually there should just be a law against having sex out of wedlock. But that can be the backup plan;-)
2006-12-20 01:45:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
thats rediculous b/c then nobody would....oh I get it. Whatever don't bring me down its a nice day. Next you are gonna say women should be at home in the kitchen instead of at work
2006-12-20 01:36:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by cma80 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think we should just all be required to watch YOU for an hour each day and that would seriously cut back on the frequency at which teenagers have unprotected sex.
2006-12-20 01:33:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jennifer F 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
The solution is to NOT have sex.
If you are having sex men included then you are getting the consequences of that action.
2006-12-20 01:35:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
no it wouldnt be a good solution
health pending for them or the baby
force them to have it to give to a family who cant
2006-12-20 01:34:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by tamah 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
As long as the guy that got her pregnant partakes of the "meal" as well.
Sleazy, don;t forget to bring your fork!
2006-12-20 01:37:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
sounds like a good one for a woman in the army
2006-12-20 01:33:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
GROSS!!! Where do you get this crap from?! Dont you have a job or something useful to society to be doing right now?!
2006-12-20 01:46:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Me 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I was going to give an angry answer to this question, but never mind!
2006-12-20 01:34:21
·
answer #11
·
answered by Sunrise 5
·
2⤊
0⤋