yea yea squalk squalk thats whats needed is more troops simply because Bush finally admits it because he was told by somebody smarter than him.........like just about any democrat. what a bunch of squalking parrots you are..............think for yourself for a change.
or is it monkey see monkey do
2006-12-20 00:42:40 · 17 answers · asked by Enigma 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
they just repeat what the "leaders" say. they are like the sheep in Orwell's Animal Farm. Repeat one phrase ad nauseum and then change the phrase and repeat the new one though it is contradictory.
2006-12-20 00:47:53 · answer #1 · answered by Boring 5 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Let's not minimize this situation. What it clearly shows is that no one has any idea what to do. Rumsfeld and Bush have been turning a deaf ear to the military's calls early in the war for more troops and now the military is questioning the need for more troops.
This whole war is an example of the old adage, "All good deeds get punished." While the liberation of the Iraqi people and the establishment of a democracy in Iraq is a wonderful concept, in reality, it just is not going to happen. Right now the future of Iraq is bleak. The American people don't have any confidence in the way Bush is running this war. And unfortunately, neither do many in the administration.
2006-12-20 08:52:12 · answer #2 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yeah, Yeah, Yeah, I get it. Just like when that famous genius from the Democratic Party, Lyndon Johnston, kept sending more and more troops to Viet nam (including your truely).
I think that President Bush was kind of forced ito this during this midterm election.
2006-12-20 08:56:32 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
People who think "more troops" in Iraq are the answer are crazy. This is the next step in the Iraq Follies! People thought if we sent more and more troops to Vietnam we would teach those "damn commies" a lesson!
More troops are only going to incite greater resistance and more targets for the insugency,
But, hey, give it a try. Another hard lesson for the Am people!
2006-12-20 08:52:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
For some reason, i never said one way or the other, but most repubs said a draft was not needed. They never said more troops were not needed
2006-12-20 09:02:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think reality is starting to catch up. Wonder how this is going to help. We have a runaway train on our hands.
2006-12-20 08:59:05 · answer #6 · answered by planksheer 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because the situation has changed in the past 6 months, twit!
You've nothing intelligent or interesting to say, just insults about things you obviously cannot grasp. Are there any liberals who AREN'T losers like you?
2006-12-20 08:51:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Yeah, I'm sure that the families of the dead soldiers and the severely wounded are just ROTFLTFAO.
2006-12-20 08:51:17 · answer #8 · answered by Retired From Y!A 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Now, now, we need to be happy that they are finally facing reality, instead of chastising them for taking 3 years to get there.
2006-12-20 08:50:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
weak minded ,selfish thoughts,,and no ability to handle a 45 auto,and kill ,as directed by BUSH...most supporters of bush,have no real experience in the death he is dealing all America,,so indecision results from this mental challenges to them,,,,not lack of money or food,,,just a lacked fundamental connection to bush and his work,,,lets pray victory's,as defeat is not in the American victory dance,,impeachment is,,,,civilian,,p,s no party affiliation here today,,only truth,as i see it...
2006-12-20 08:52:43 · answer #10 · answered by CIVILIAN 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You are just full of mindless hate today, aren't you? Why do you keep saying no Republican thinks for himself? If that's so, where do we get our ideas? President Bush? No, he's a parrot too...hmm. I think I just fell into a large hole in your logic.
2006-12-20 08:48:13 · answer #11 · answered by charlie h 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋