In the kuran it attempts to describe the fetus in the womb... And muslims love to say how accurate it is.
However, it is not accurate at all. Furthermore, the kurans description of the fetus is nearly word for word the same as the greeks description, from hundreds of years earlier.
Is it just that the muslims don't know about this, or do they truly believe what the kuran says, and not what modern science says?
2006-12-19 20:10:11 · 9 answers · asked by RED MIST! 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Thank you Brad. I would have gone into that, but I didn't feel like it.
2006-12-19 20:15:22 · update #1
Reasearch Aristotle's and Hippocrates views on reproduction.
It was aristotle, around 5th centurey BC, that first came up with notion that the fetus would look like a clot. By the way, the only way a fetus would ever look like a clot is in the case of a misscarriage.
2006-12-19 20:24:38 · update #2
I know exactly what you are talking about and i have seen muslim pamphlets that try to show the Quran correctly shows how a fetus grows but if you read the entire passage you will see that it is untrue! the passage in the Quran says first it is a clot of blood, then grows bones, then muscles and skin grow around it. modern science has discovered that we are not a clot of blood originally and that muscles develop before bones
the problem is that the muslims immams twist and turn the words and their meanings to make it appear as if the Quran is making some sort of scientific miracle when in fact it is doing the opposite
2006-12-19 20:14:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
They believe that every word in the Qu'ran is fact and that none of it has been altered to suit men. Forget the fact that it was all written by ONE man who claimed to be a prophet. And science? Well, it has explained how several of the miracles in the Bible occurred but it has yet to prove anything in the Qu'ran...all science does is disprove that one.
2006-12-20 04:17:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can you show where I can read the Greek description to compare it to the Koran's I find that very interesting
2006-12-20 04:18:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Koran is filled with plagiarism yet it is a "true book." Sorry the Koran is a dud.
2006-12-20 04:14:58 · answer #4 · answered by UCF Scholar 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
All religious texts and "holey" books are little more than collections of myths and fairy tales. Hopefully the day will come when we place them on the shelf next to Homer's Odyssey and Ovid's Metamorphosis where they belong.
2006-12-20 04:14:02 · answer #5 · answered by jaden404 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
science had proved that for a very long time ago!
2006-12-20 04:14:09 · answer #6 · answered by guru 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
too much Islam bashing and not enough of Jesus Loving.
2006-12-20 04:14:55 · answer #7 · answered by floyd 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
im really sure that u dont understand what u are saying.
2006-12-20 04:17:23 · answer #8 · answered by Sameh C 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
what???
2006-12-20 04:12:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋