state briefly how you would recognize one. how does the confucian ideal person differ from the theravada buddhish monk?
ive sort of answered the first and second question. however, i am having a hard time answering the last one. so far i have...theravada monks are not ascribing to become great leaders and i think...acquiring knowledge is a bit different. the monks would learn the scriptures the teaching of buddha ..but the confucian ideal person would actually try to gain knowledge through mostly everything: formal education, the arts, socially, etc. i'm not that sure if that those are correct. can anyone add more to that?
2006-12-19 18:54:52 · 4 answers · asked by may 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Confucious say "Wise man learns from the mistakes of the Fool and the Fool, from his own."
Melly Chlistmas!!!!
2006-12-19 19:21:52 · answer #1 · answered by Daimyo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you know the answer and i shall confirm your find alright one is material and the other is spiritual and the monk would definately be the wiser most true one in all times shapes forms and fashion cunfucian is missing all spiritual aspects which leaves him much to be desired!
To be all is to be nothing!
2006-12-19 19:03:24 · answer #2 · answered by wise 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is none perfect but God.The excellent human does not exist
2006-12-19 18:59:18 · answer #3 · answered by gwhiz1052 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
confusion
2006-12-19 18:57:01 · answer #4 · answered by chi 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋