Anyone but him...please....
2006-12-19 18:15:02 · 16 answers · asked by *Beautiful Zephyr* 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
True, we did go through a couple of bad times with Bill Clinton, but you can't argue that Bush is worse. How many soldiers are dying for nothing under his authority? How many Americans died in 9/11 for nothing but Bush's stupidity? Think about it.
Now tell me who you want.
2006-12-20 14:03:46 · update #1
I would, you would, about 2/3 of America and 90% of the world would rather have anyone else in the office of the Presidency than the man currently in it.
Most of us would rather have an flea ridden rabies infested baboon in the White House than the current occupant, actually.
2006-12-19 19:25:21 · answer #1 · answered by James A 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well beautiful, sounds like a loaded question. I know you rapid anti-Clinton folks already have all the answers, So I am asking you a question.
How can you witness the horror that Bush has caused and not be wounded by it yourself? Have you no shame? Bush is a fool, but a deadly one with his maniac stubbornness.
If the new conservatives are not dead at least for a decade, then this Country is brain dead and going through the final throws of its life. So just keep it up with your high brow judgments and little capacity for understanding anything. Go the way of George W. Bush. And good riddance.
2006-12-20 02:30:31 · answer #2 · answered by zclifton2 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
ME!!!!!!! Clinton may have had his private life too much in the open, but-----as president, I cannot complain. He is intelligent and does consider all sides of a situation.
Then, anyone would be better than Bush-anyone at all!!
2006-12-20 06:24:55 · answer #3 · answered by Shossi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have to ask why? He sent us to war in Bosnia, Serbia, Somalia. We suffered 4 terrorist attacks under him, and Al-Qaida stated that they planned the 911 attacks while he was in office,based on how easy it was to get us to run in Somalia. The Economy is actually better right now than it was under Clinton, even with the wars, and gas prices. The stock market is higher, the AVERAGE person is getting more back on his taxes, and the average pay is higher. Housing is great, unemployment is lower. So what is it really that you miss about Clinton? He was a great speaker, and very personable, but he did nothing that history will remember with any fondness. The only thing i can see is he did not get as many American soldiers killed in wars, but he also got America a reputation as a country without the stomach to fight. Sorry but I will take self respect and a little pride, the willingness to stand up for what we believe in and fight for it if necessary.
2006-12-20 03:07:05 · answer #4 · answered by mark g 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Ignorance is bliss.
Up until you find out you've gutted your intelligence services and encouraged the aggressive actions of foreign warlords, that is.
Right now, I suggest we draft John Howard in '08. He's the only free-world leader that's willing to kick butt with both the political and military competition.
2006-12-20 02:28:18 · answer #5 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would. Clinton was a great president, and he got a bad rep for the dumbest reasons. He might be back in the oval office vicariously in 2008, though...
2006-12-20 02:27:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
they both work for the same illuminati strategy ,so it does not make any difference.
34 presidents are related to the house of Charlemagne and charles the great ,and to the European royalty,they all follow the same Agenda .
check -blood lines of the illuminat by David Icke in www.infowars
If Hilary gets in ,hold on to your hat ,she is from the same genetics and probably the most evil.of this time
2006-12-20 02:22:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
i would rather have clinton as prez right now...and if anyone wants to set me straight and say how clinton sucks and bush rules...feel free to IM me
2006-12-20 02:23:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
many people but their voices can not be heard on YAHOO. i like ms Clinton in the white house.
2006-12-20 02:20:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No-Bush is a man we don't need a wuss like Clinton there.
2006-12-20 02:17:01 · answer #10 · answered by josh m 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋