when drawing using proportion in "heads"...how do you confront the problem of foreshortening?

Question

I always see, in drawing books, diagrams that show proportions relative to head lengths and the diagrams always show a person standing straight up with no foreshortening. Is there any mathematical way to apply these figures in foreshortening (3Dimensional Space) or are these proportions just to be used loosely as reference material when confronting the problem of foreshortening in those instances?

To Nana: Thank you for your help but I thought I should let you know that many artists incorporate math into their art, All you have to do is look at old Da Vinci drawings and you will see alot of math, look at Escher, look at Islamic art, Celtic Knots, etc...It isn't in high fashion these days to do so, but that doesn't make it illegal.

To Somebody Real: I take it from your advice that you are saying I should measure by eye and forget the math.

Answer 1

Foreshortening is the same as 1 point perspective. It is very mathematical if you are left brained, but if you're right brained it is simple. The Further away an object is, the smaller it becomes. If the closest thing to my face is the bottom of a big foot, then obviously the head at the other end of the body will be smaller, yes according to mathematics. But some things may be mathematically correct but will have an illusion that it looks off kilter. That is why artists are artists and not mathematicians, we have to have the "eye" to ignore the math and make it look correct to the eye. By the way not all people are proportioned according to the general rule of head lengths. Some people have shorter limbs, and others have big heads. Some people who may be petite have big feet. Foreshortening is not easy to do because it creates a battle between the right and left sides of the brain.

Answer 2

i'd say basically suck it up and save a low profile. we are a procedures sufficient alongside this quarter, i does not wanna retake the kind, you're in week 4 - so that you will be able to drop with out the business ding... I favor to bypass into week 5 with a cushion although. i have talked to both Rucker, Shneider and Witcher about raw feeding and none of them have topics with it see you later by way of the indisputable fact that is performed acceptable and the nutrition comes from a respected source; i will't imagine the shopper speaker diverging too a procedures from the overall consensus of the faculty of our faculty, even although I do trust that is a Hill's rep that teaches the kind... the precedence with raw feeding is that maximum human beings do not have the dedication, time or information to do it acceptable and that replaced into the reason not one of the above school feed it. canines are opportunistic carnivores, they don't seem to be obligate carnivores like cats hence the choose for "eco-friendly tripe" interior the load help application (Rucker A&P a million). :P

Answer 3

If you're a math drawer, sorry can't help you. Just use the box method. Each part has a box. The box has perception applied to it, and you draw within the box. Plain and simple.

12/20-- Yes. You see people everyday. You would be able to tell if something were misplaced or poorly sized.