They will forever be noticeable. I have had a tattoo artist tell me that the ink will usually not take to the stretch marks because the skin is damaged.
I'm one of those weirdos who considers having the stretch marks from giving birth ammo for when the kids get older. "See what you did to your mother? Now you want WHAT pierced??" LOL
2006-12-19 15:31:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Linda v 1
·
2⤊
1⤋
The stretch marks can be greatly disguised by the tattooing. Interestingly enough, the action of the needles even helps to flatten out the raised areas a little bit too. In most cases, if you really look, you will be able to find them, though.
Over all, a marked improvement nonetheless.
2006-12-19 15:20:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by tatt_bratt 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Stretch marks are difficult to tattoo over because the skin texture varies from place to place
2006-12-19 15:17:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bonita Applebaum 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, they still show but they can tattoo over them to make them less noticeable.
2006-12-19 15:18:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
u can still see the stretch marks...in fact it looks worse when u jus try to cover them up that way
and u can cause problems with ur skin if u do that
2006-12-19 15:58:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by kaeh 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
which? the kids, the stretch marks or the tattoos?
2006-12-19 15:17:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
id say yes
2006-12-19 15:17:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by justin k 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes
2006-12-19 15:17:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
refine question
2006-12-19 15:18:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
no
2006-12-19 15:18:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by rajan naidu 7
·
1⤊
3⤋