English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

what is so wrong with Jesus having a child and or a wife?to me, that doesn't lessen his divinity. He was sent to earth, made a human, so that he could save us all, and so does his having a child and a wife make him all the more human?what is so wrong with that? to me, if that was the case, it would be wonderful. He could relate more to us and vice versa, right?

2006-12-19 15:11:47 · 21 answers · asked by cess 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

21 answers

I agree because he was sent here to experience life as we know it, being married with children would teach him alot.

2006-12-19 15:21:31 · answer #1 · answered by Sean 7 · 0 0

There is so much wrong with it.
1. why would he marry and have a child when he knew he was going to die? I wouldn't want to puposely leave a family behind.
2. he preached his whole time on earth to save souls. would our savior take time out to have a family instead of saving the souls he came to save?
3. consider the source where this story came from. where are the facts to back it?
4. wouldn't the child of jesus continue to have divine powers? if they had children all the way until now don't you think we would know someone that had divine powers?
5. this story tries to bring jesus and God more down to our human sinful level.
6. Would the same man (jesus) that told us that lustful thoughts in our head are a sin, have sexual relations with a woman that could lead to sexual urges that were sinful?

believe

2006-12-19 15:30:10 · answer #2 · answered by waiting4u2believe 2 · 0 0

I personally think there are two issues. The biggest problem is the ethical issue. If Jesus knew his destiny with the cross, would it be right to leave behind a wife and young children in a world that did not afford them rights? The other issue is would the kids be half-divine? and what exactly is that?

As far as marriage or sex being a sin - I don't buy it.

2006-12-19 15:30:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

it isn't that it should be incorrect that Jesus had a spouse and little ones if that's what the Bible reported about him. that is because the Bible does not say this that we merchandise to the accusation. We experience that if this replaced right into a truth, God would have had the Bible authors write about it. What more beneficial way would there have been to coach adult males a thanks to attend to their better halves? good? It not basically says some thing which could not interior the Bible, it also provides the effect that Jesus replaced right into a trifling mortal guy extremely than the Son of God. What purpose would a spouse have served to him? His entire youngster and man or woman existence replaced into dedicated to serving God and easily serving God. A spouse would were a hinderence.

2016-11-30 23:52:16 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Since the Bible explicitedly states that Jesus was fully human, I don't understand the big stink either. Sexuality is definitely a major part of being human, but most will lean towards the diety perspective while the gnostics will even go further to distance Jesus was any human characteristics.

2006-12-19 15:15:50 · answer #5 · answered by Turnhog 5 · 0 0

Nothing at all.

Jesus was called Rabbi many times in the bible.

According to Jewish law; Rabbis had to be married, and the family of good character.

If the people had been told the truth about Jesus; the Priests would have lost all power over the converts.to Catholicism.

2006-12-19 15:58:22 · answer #6 · answered by Rev. Two Bears 6 · 0 0

To be honest. There is nothing wrong. Maybe in the eyes of some, it is because he was like a priest and priests aren't supposed to marry. However, all we have on Jesus are a few gospels that could have been edited while they were put together to make the gospels of Luke, Mark, John, and Peter. BTW, I am a christian

2006-12-19 15:18:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It wont be wrong if we say Jesus Christ (Peace Be Upon Him) was a human (and he was 100% human).

But it would be a Blunder if we say that Jesus Christ was a son of GOD and he had a child. Why?

How can GOD have human needs and still be GOD? How can GOD provide food to HIS Creation and still eat? How can GOD sleep, marry, grow old and put HIS son into place?

If that all a GOD can safely do and still be GOD, then we all are GODs.

The Islamic concept is that, Jesus Christ (PBUH) was a messenger of GOD not son of GOD. SO if he was married or not is not an issue.

2006-12-19 15:26:24 · answer #8 · answered by flameslivewire 3 · 0 0

There's nothing wrong with that theory. The only problem is that non-believers use this theory to say that he did not die on the cross and that he instead married Mary Magdelene and had children. It's a flawed theory used to discredit Christianity. Thats why so many Christians are opposed to it.

2006-12-19 15:19:28 · answer #9 · answered by Bahaus B 3 · 0 0

Nothing wrong.
When He will come back he will live a married life with children. And he will die naturally.
After death The Mighty Prophet will be burried beside Prophet Muhammad insha Allah.
There is one place is already reserved for Him.

http://www.beconvinced.com
http://www.islamreligion.com

2006-12-19 19:08:52 · answer #10 · answered by Slave 3 · 0 0

Jesus was never meant to have a 'normal' life like the rest of us.
The purpose in being 'sent' to the earth for us was to give his precious life as a 'ransom sacrifice' and buy back for us the 'penalty' of always having to die.[Genesis 2;16,17]
[Rev.21;4]
A normal family would have impeded his purpose

2006-12-19 16:16:27 · answer #11 · answered by pugjw9896 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers