If all the countries in the world attacked the US, would they win?

Answer 1

HELL NO....... Right now we are fighting with gloves on we are trying to abide by the Geneva convention with regards to rules of engagement but if the world were to attach us the gloves would come off. we by far have more war ships then the rest of the worlds navy's combined. we have more bombers and fighters then all the air forces combined. we have ballistic missiles that can hit moving targets the size of V.W. bugs a ship large enough to transport the amount of troops that it would take to attempt an attach on our soil would be no problem ships at see are slow say they have really fast ships 45 knots that would be 51.8 mph and i doubt ships that large could make those type of speeds. but 51.8 mph in the sea would be a very easy target. so we just set back and wipe out there troops while there on there way over. CAN WE SURVIVE A WAR OF THIS MAGNITUDE NO..... THEY WOULD FIRE NUKES WE WOULD FIRE NUKES WE WOULD ALL DIE..... YOU HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION MY HYPOTHETICAL ANSWER. BUT IN THE REAL WORLD WE WOULD ALL DIE......

Answer 2

The war is not country against country. The US people are good people. Other countries of the world are made up of good people. It is savage leaders and hidden so called elite that run the world. There is plans for severe population reduction around the world. They keep widening government and centralizing power. There is plans to make the US Canada and Mexico all under 1 police force and 1 set of rules with open borders. And even merge the currency to the Amero. It won't be long before we have a one world government where the higher ups can do anything they want to us. The fight is not in Iraq. The fight is at home. 9/11 is the best place to start. It was an inside job and must be exposed. Also they must stop littering Iraq with depleted uranium. What they are doing to that country is irreversable. Its so bad! Stop the tyranny!

Answer 3

Imagining that none will use Nukes(they will destroy the mankind), I think that US can not resist to all the rest of the world.
Imagine China, Russia, India, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Africa, Europe, Japan, etc, etc......... too much also for USA.
USA has a population of about 300'000'000. World has about 6'000'000'000.
So 1/20 of the population of the world is American, that means that every American would have to front 19 people from the rest of the world, really too much, because, US weapon technology is usually better than other, but not so superior to let Americans have a kill ratio of 19. For example M1 Abrams is considered the best tank, but not enough to fight against a lot of tanks like Leopard, T-72, Merkeva, Ariete, Challenger, Type-90, Leclerc.....(probably not 19 because not all countries has the same tank/population ratio, but imagine at least 7 !?!?!).
The same for airplanes...F-15, F-16, F-18,F-22, etc are really good, but are they so good to fight against a lot of planes like Mirage, Typhoon, MiG-29, Tornado, Su-27, F-4, Su-30, Rafale, Saab Viggen or Griphen for each? (remember that countries like Israel, Arabia, Japan, Australia, Belgium, Norway, Denmark, Portugal, Switzerland, Spain, Turkey, Greece, Egypt, Italy, Finland, Holland, etc... have F-15, F-16 or F-18 too).
The superior technology is important, but number is important too.....during WW2 Russian commanders said that "number has a quality by itself".
You should not forget that a large part of US forces are spread around the world in bases in Europe, Gulf area, Japan, ecc, so if you ipotize an immediate change of the situation these forces are virtually surrounded...and lost.

Answer 4

Such an attack would be devastating to the entire world. Such an attack would require sea-borne invasion or an assembling of troops in Canada and Mexico beforehand. Neither of which could be done undetected.

So the first issue would be how well the Navy and Air Force would be able to attack the world's troops as they crossed the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. You could expect large losses among the international community. Then they have to invade. Our military is several generations ahead of the rest of the world militarily, particularly in the area of ground forces. Should international forces survive the oceanic barriers to our country, they then get to face our troops on our home turf facing the natural barriers that our mountains and rivers present.

We would either slaughter them easily or slaughter them slowly in a meatgrinder they cannot afford.

Answer 5

If all countries VS the US, absolutely. America simply doesnt have the numbers to win.

300 million total pop of the US Vs 6 billion in the rest of the world.

Thats 20 non-US for every 1 US.

Answer 6

No. Most countries can't deploy much more than a platoon outside of their borders and then they couldn't support them once they got to the combat theater. For example, many of the South/Central American countries that deployed to Iraq arrived in country with almost nothing and had to be outfitted by Uncle Sam.

Play the game "Risk" sometime. It is a good reflection of both how difficult it is to take the US and how difficult it is to advance anywhere else from the US.

Answer 7

No. They would all be losers because once the U.S. is gone there will be no country willing to come to the aid of another country after it's attacked by it's so called Allie in the war against the U.S.

The EU might be a union but the countries hate each other. They're always trying to screw each other in their negotiations.

The Asians all believe their way is the only way so there won't be any peace there.

Answer 8

There would be no need for a physical attack of a miltary kind, economic blockades, financial boycots and withdrawing all foreign investment from the US would bring you to your knees fairly soon.
But that's not going to happen unless the idiotic voters of the United States (those who aren't deliberately disenfranchised that is) elect another Republican government and then God help us all you idiots.

Answer 9

well it depends if you realy mean ALL the countries then we would have serious problems, while i greatly respect our armed forces fighting ability there are some things even to tough for them, but first off, any one not in north or south america would have a hard time getting here, however you could use cilvilian cargo ships and passanger liners to tranport troops over, using the navys of russia, germany,france and england as escorts, they would also be the most heavy air sopport providers, but even simpler would be to economicly beat us, we rely a lot on other countries so i think we would lost through economics

Answer 10

In a nuclear world, size no longer matters.... Our only threat would be the other strategic nuclear powers....but of course that would mean global suicide.

Answer 11

China would destroy America over 1 billion people. The Russians have more tanks than the US. All of them have Air Forces so those two countries could defeat us.