I cannot think of one.
2006-12-19 12:43:41 · 14 answers · asked by Chainsaw 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The Cold War is wrong because Reagan built up American military weapons and eventually the Soviets could not keep up and were very afraid they would be used on them.
2006-12-19 12:57:28 · update #1
None.
The cold war was won by the U.S. out building the Soviets in military power.
There will not be peace in the mid east until one side is gone. Which side would you like it to be? The side that embraces freedom and education or the side that cuts your head off for reading anything other than the koran??
It seems that some U.S. citizens are having a tough time with that decision.....
2006-12-19 12:56:21 · answer #1 · answered by noobienoob2000 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
all conflicts that have not turned to war have been temporarily solved. That could be thousands of wars solved or avoided.
That is the major world conflict that has been solved.
Once a boundary is broken you have no choice but to go to war. Unless you are willing to be anothers slave? Only Christians have the power to do that. It's not everyone who can be the least and a slave to everyone.
So when your mother-in-law crosses your boundaries you must go to war with her immediately and cause her to retreat back to her border or boundaries. Nations and people are very much the same.
Negotiations have solved a lot of family wars.
2006-12-19 20:55:49 · answer #2 · answered by lovefights 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The dispute over the ownership of the San Juan Islands (WA) which resulted in what is called "The Pig War"; this occured in 1856.Both the British and the Americans believed they were the proper owners of this group of islands. They agreed to let the King of Prussia decide who was the proper owner.
2006-12-19 21:06:57 · answer #3 · answered by geglefty 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not one. The only ones that were solved were by military force. And the problem is that the libs think military force is wrong (or even illegal. The naivety of it all!). Anyway, all treaties, forged by negotiation, were brought about subsequently by military force. The libs have no concept of history, or any understanding of islamofacism. Its sad that so many Americans fall into these liberal lies...
2006-12-19 21:10:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Cold War
2006-12-19 20:46:42 · answer #5 · answered by Ethernaut 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Egypt Israeli conflict. USA, UK, Libya conflict. Going back into history, The Treaty of Utrecht 1713.
2006-12-19 21:08:39 · answer #6 · answered by tiger 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Neville Chamb . . . wait, that was . . . just a minute.
There was Jimmy Cahta and the Iran hostage . . . hold on, wait.
Um, The UN had inspectors go into Saddam's Iraq to, uh, . . .
Yeah, the UN, uh, the UN . . . no it was an economic embargo. . .
Ya know what? I can't think of one either
2006-12-19 21:03:26 · answer #7 · answered by s2scrm 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Japan and Russia in 1906 ?
2006-12-19 21:01:55 · answer #8 · answered by planksheer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The cuban missle crisis is one.
2006-12-20 09:48:31 · answer #9 · answered by jamie d 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The great donut strike of 1936.
2006-12-19 20:50:39 · answer #10 · answered by Shaddup Libs 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋