With the failure of Michael Behe and his theory of Irreducible Complexity in the flagellum and other organisms, is it now (or better yet, always been) that IC really means lazyness to think?
Evolution of the Flagellum: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdwTwNPyR9w
2006-12-19 12:03:41 · 8 answers · asked by Alucard 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No. I think it's more "We have to think of SOMETHING that won't offend God because -- GASP -- evolution is starting to make SENSE!!!!"
2006-12-19 12:11:37 · answer #1 · answered by Voodoid 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Anything labeled "intelligent design" or "irreductible complexity" stems from intellectual cowardice, not actual science.
So yes, you are correct.
And thanks for the link to the Flagellum. Funny how actual science kicks the crap out of mythology huh?
2006-12-19 20:06:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's like I say (and I'm pretty sure I originated this one): "Intelligent Design it the argument that if your watch doesn't have a second hand, you don't know what time it is."
2006-12-19 23:31:50 · answer #3 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bang on with that one - YUP!
And yes, "Intelligent Design" is as ridiculous a thing as "The Sphagetti Monster" and JUST as provable...See for yourself
2006-12-19 20:08:01 · answer #4 · answered by mytraver 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
And the evolution of the eye...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Stb9pQc9Kq0
:)
2006-12-19 20:10:34 · answer #5 · answered by Snark 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Huh? You will have to put that into "laymans" terms for me. I read a little about the string theory, does that count?
2006-12-19 20:09:16 · answer #6 · answered by Lukusmcain// 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Is "I'm to lazy to figure out how it evolved" the new liberal humanist way of saying "I'm too lazy to learn grammer"?
2006-12-19 20:33:21 · answer #7 · answered by Jimmy Dean 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Or "I'm too stupid to figure it out..."
2006-12-19 20:04:58 · answer #8 · answered by Cindy Lou Who --P3D-- 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋