it depends upon the person...
maturity & stability is always best to have before you bring another life into the world, but no one is perfect.
i am 24 & my body is ready... but my husband & i want to finish college first.
2006-12-19 11:56:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by christy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
When the person stops looking at parenthood thru rose-colored glasses. I'd say anywhere from 18 to 25. It would have to do with maturity, ability to provide life's necessities, and strength of will to give up certain personal pleasures (late nights partying, for example) to take care of the child properly.
Would that person use pregnancy to trap a man, or think of that baby as a substitute for parental love lost? Would that person be able to go thru pregnancy without using illegal drugs, alcohol or tobacco? Or would that baby be considered a badge of honor for sleeping with someone popular or powerful (like the captain of the football team, a musician or a gangster)? If any part of these questions can be answered with a yes, you aren't ready.
2006-12-19 11:58:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Angela M 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Good question.
I think rather then it depending on the age, it depends on the person and their maturity. I know a couple of 19yo's with babies. One is too immature, she makes her mother look after the child, and she's having a second already which saddens me.
However, another 19yo I know looks after her two children with such passion and responsibilty, I actually thought she was a lot older. She is one of the best mothers I've seen.
But then, I know a woman I think she's about 26 and she isn't ready AT ALL. Her mother helps out a lot, and she seems to be very clueless.
I think it varies with each individual and how they feel inside. Obviously I think 18,17,16 is WAAY too young, however it doesn't mean that person will be a bad mother. But having years on them, 26,27,28 etc doesn't make you a good mother either.
2006-12-19 12:00:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
In todays age i think of age has no longer something to do with having a infant. for my area, i think of it quite is greater substantial that the youngster have 2 mother and father. they do no longer must be married,yet they must be residing at the same time, and dedicated to a minimum of one yet another. nicely, it relatively is for youthful people. After a definite age, it quite is not as much as me to verify the age,yet to me I see it as approximately forty or so,whilst a woman has desperate she might or would possibly no longer get married and actually needs a infant, then it quite is fantastic to have a infant on your guy or woman. i'm no longer passing judgement, basically being real looking. It must be at a factor the place a unmarried woman is making sufficient money to help herself and a infant in a type it relatively is above poverty, a type it relatively is gentle, the place a babysitter may be employed and the place interior the workplace there is the two day care, or day care may be paid for. it relatively is no person's company however the guy's as to what age she is whilst she has a infant. I even have pals who had infants whilst they have been of their young people,approximately 18 or 19,and to be trustworthy,a sort of households is the closest and maximum cohesive family members I even have ever considered. There are 3 infants and that all of them get alongside like pals better than basically brothers and sister. it quite is magnificent to verify. And mom is a ingredient of each and every thing as are her pals (which incorporate my husband and me). So, who's to decide.
2016-10-15 06:45:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Generaly, it would be better for people to be financially, emotionally, etc ready and took parenting classes. I don't know, maybe it's just me, but I just find it a little hard to imagine how an 18 year old or 17 year old is going to have enough money to care for a family, when they themsevles have not graduated high school and is earning minimum wage. Even if you were to double that income, it still wouldn't be enough to buy a house, car, and take care of the other bills.
2006-12-19 12:02:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think there is a certain age. I don't believe anyone is really ever "ready" for a baby, but as long as you're in a stable marriage, with a stable income, have finished your education and can and want to provide a loving home for a baby, then you can think about it then....whatever age that may be.
2006-12-19 11:56:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by First Lady 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
age means nothing really. A woman in her 30's could have no income, still be living at home while a 19 year old woman can make 100,000 a year, have her own hous. Also, a 40 year old woman can be a crackhead. You can't pin it all on age. Ideally it would be good to wait until someone is financially, emotionally, and physically able to have a child, not to mention a great relationship.
2006-12-19 11:52:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I feel it is not by age but by stability..Think about it. If you have no job and you live with your parents is that a great time to have a baby? No, because you are bringing a child into the world without stability already. It will be much harder to raise a child without a good career and a great relationship with the father...So I feel it is not an age issue but a stability stand point..
2006-12-19 12:01:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by <-K:N:O:X-> 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
It really depends on the individual.
This day and time I recommend after a person has gone through college, or after the age of 24.
2006-12-19 11:51:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by JB 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i don't think age has much to do with it, i think it's maturity level and whether they want one. for instance, if they have a good joba nd are stabel, but don't want a baby, then they wouldn't be ready for one. on the other hand, someone who doesn't have a good job, but has had their job for a long time, and wants one and is willing to work extra hard to take care of it throughout the years, then they are ready.
2006-12-19 13:04:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mommyof4 3
·
0⤊
0⤋