Bush and his gang of thugs in the White House along with cronies of his father have plundered raped this World for greed while pretending to look for the non-existant WMDs. What misery to countless people whose homes/lives have been destroyed and plundered so all US Armament could be used to make way for manufacture of new more deadly weapons thus giving rich corporate bastards like Haliburton and Defense Contractors to pllage American money under the disguise of defending DEMOCRACY????? Who are these Clowns kidding ????
2006-12-19 10:12:32 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I suspect The Shrub doesn't quite see it that way.
2006-12-19 10:16:17 · answer #1 · answered by poptop 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Another question with lunacy theories. It is apparent that you have not been to the middle east nor have any clue to what you are talking about. OK, I'll start slow. WMD's. They were in Iraq, now they are in a little place called Syria. Defense contractors and Haliburton. Income for American workers, not illegals. Misery to countless people? Ask those people that were in Saddams torture rooms. I believe they have it a little better know. As far as plundered the world for greed? Where? If anything, where is our share for what we've done. The so called "bastards" as you say, are part of keeping the economy moving. You are one of the many closed minded morons that is hampering the effort at hand. Step aside and let the big boys do their job.
2006-12-19 18:29:37 · answer #2 · answered by tim g 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Misery, Harm, and Tragedy come one! What about all the misery, harm and tragedy that has been spared around the would during the Bush administration. Women in Afghanistan can now go to school. The Kurds in northern Iraq no longer have to carry around gas masks and are free to govern themselves. Humanitrian aid to tsunami victims. as for the defense contractors. The defense contractors you speak of is a large part of the reason the US economy has rebounded. Putting more money into your pocket as well.
2006-12-19 19:05:47 · answer #3 · answered by mopar13az 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I share your outrage. After all this time under Bush the usurper I still can't tell whether he's a mad man, an evil genius, a puppet, an idiot, or what. Maybe he has no clue as to the damage he's caused. Maybe he knows and our current situation is exactly what he planned all along. Maybe he just doesn't care one way or the other. I wonder if we'll ever know. Personally, I think his actions in the 2000 elections should have gotten him tried for treason. Apparently the powers that be don't agree.
2006-12-19 18:29:55 · answer #4 · answered by socrates 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
On January 20, 2009, GWB will go back into private life, and will be the epitome of the saying, "Living well is the best revenge."
He is independently wealthy several times over, and has a loving family, and I am certain that he is going to take a nice long vacation after his term is over.
Then he will can sit back and laugh at whoever gets the hot seat next.
There's an old song by The Who, and a refrain in the song is:
"Meet the new boss,
Same as the old boss..."
2006-12-19 18:27:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Raped the world? Oh, please. First of all, if this war WAS about oil, why didn't we just open ANWR to drilling, like the vast majority of Alaskans want? There's lots of oil off-shore in the states - again, if this is an oil war, why didn't we tap those resources first? Would have been a hell of a lot easier than going to war.
Non-existent WMDs? Really? Wow. So mustard and sarin gases are no longer considered WMDs?
Oh, screw it. Your mind is set so it doesn't matter. Thanks for the 2 points.
2006-12-19 18:26:42 · answer #6 · answered by Jadis 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Ya know it's quite amusing that you place the blame on Bush.
You have a wedgie. Must be Bush's fault.
Why don't you place the blame where it belongs? With Saddam.
2006-12-19 18:40:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush seem to be pretty content with what he is doing. Does he seem worried to you?
2006-12-19 18:22:14 · answer #8 · answered by WC 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If they have lived with what you describe so far, I am confident they will have no problem doing so in the future.
2006-12-19 18:16:05 · answer #9 · answered by kingstubborn 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You forget that Bush is an idealist...not a realist. To him, there are no marines getting their legs blown off, and everything will be great in the end.
2006-12-19 18:19:03 · answer #10 · answered by opjames 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋