2006-12-19 09:27:26 · 19 answers · asked by L-dog =) 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
For those of you who believe in the Primordial soup theory..
I hate to burst your bubble but that theory has lost stature in the new discovery that all Proteins and DNA must have the same chirality in order to hold the string together. Since when produced in the way you contend they are a 50/50 mixture of the two optical isomers it becomes clear that random chance process could have never formed these proteins and DNA with their unique chirality. Chirality is not just a major problem for evolution; it is a dilemma. According to evolution, natural processes must explain everything over long periods of time. However, the process that forms chirality cannot be explained by natural science in any amount of time.
I hope this helps your education and you give up the impossible thinking of the flawed science of mankind and turn to Jesus Christ.
Jim
2006-12-19 10:11:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
i think this is a very good question. Where did the matter for different species to have evolved from come form. or can evolution occur from nothing. come on darwin give us the answer.
2006-12-19 17:47:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
On this planet?
Ocean vents. And first things are still being created and will evolve into organisms with organs and organelles. Some will make it farther up the food chain than others.
Evolution will keep trying to make a better, smarter, more useful organism with or without our help.
2006-12-19 17:38:22 · answer #3 · answered by PreCursor 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Everything came from the cosmos, which is eternal. Gases and elements interacted, exploded, melded in fiery heat and transformed themselves.
Where do your cells come from? You don't "create" them. Your body produces them. The cosmos produced you, and everything and everyone, not by creation but by gradual blending processes.
Rent the dvds, or look on TV listings for the "Cosmos" series, written and hosted by Carl Sagan: you'll be amazed.
2006-12-19 17:33:52 · answer #4 · answered by Sweetchild Danielle 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Research abiogenesis. It is not evolution by the way. Evolution only deals with diversity, not the beginning...regarding life.
2006-12-19 17:30:00 · answer #5 · answered by bc_munkee 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That would be abiogenesis, which isn't actually evolution. Do some reaserch on that. It is pretty interesting. Here is an experiment done on the subject.
http://www.chem.duke.edu/~jds/cruise_chem/Exobiology/miller.html
2006-12-19 17:46:38 · answer #6 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're confusing abiogenesis with evolution
evolution does not state how life on earth originated, just that populations of organisms change (evolve) over time
2006-12-19 17:29:09 · answer #7 · answered by Nick F 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Abiogenesis, panspermia (which begs the question of the origin of life), or any other hypothesis. Evolution is what hapened after life arose, so your question is irrelevant.
2006-12-19 17:43:16 · answer #8 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Science cannot explain how the first matter organized into one single cell... This is from my University Prof of Biology, who is probably an evolutionist himself...
More philosophically,where did matter come from
Disbelievers are truly astray!
2006-12-19 17:33:02 · answer #9 · answered by onewhosubmits 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In as much as I was not around to see how everything came into being (and neither were you),I say, "I don't know ..... YET!" To assume that some god, my less than intellectual ancestors made up, instantaneously farted the universe into being, is absurd
2006-12-19 17:35:47 · answer #10 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋