English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The 2 muslim brothers,one shot by police,were clearly involved in some activity.
Why cant we be told what it was?
They had child porn on their PC and werent charged.
Thye had £28000 cash hidden, why , where was it from?
Did the police decide to sweep these offences under the carpet to appease the muslim poulation? Again!
After release they were being abusive to british soldiers on duty,with threats to kill,They werent charged..why?

2006-12-19 08:41:59 · 11 answers · asked by ? 3 in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

11 answers

Don't get me started on this one, it makes my blood boil and i'll be here all night.

Great question, send a copy to the Chief of Police and see what utter rubbish they come up with.

2006-12-19 08:45:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 5

Because they were innocent.

The terrorist link turned out to be b*llshit. The story about the police finding kiddy porn on their PC has never been substantiated, or even followed up.

It's not uncommon for the Met to harass people who make them look foolish for whatever reason; Malcolm Kennedy's case is a good example - read here :

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3051792.stm

or http://www.red-star-research.org.uk/malcolm.html

[Yes Red Star Research is a left-wing site but the only one I can find which deals with his case in detail]

I don't know where the cash came from but it's not unusual for immigrant families to mistrust banks, so some do keep all their funds at home. This on its own proves nothing.

"After release they were being abusive to british soldiers on duty,with threats to kill,They werent charged..why?" Probably because there was no realistic prospect of getting a conviction and it would give them further grounds for accusing the police of harassment.

2006-12-20 13:08:44 · answer #2 · answered by Huh? 7 · 2 2

No terrorist paraphanalia was found at the house, and I dont know anything about porn or cash - probably rumour, im sure if there was porn the police would have charged them.

The threats to kill though- are there not laws against that? They should have been charged.

2006-12-27 12:05:19 · answer #3 · answered by Shaun D 2 · 1 0

They had child porn and large sums of cash in the same way that Charles Jean de Menezes was wearing a bulky coat and ran and jumped the tube ticket barriers. ie., they didn't.

The Metropolitan police time and again brief the press with wholly untrue nonsense, in an attempt to justify their bungled operations and muddy the waters to avoid prosecution. The Met leak false info like this all the time, the gutter press run plenty of stories of outrage and moral indignation, then later it emerges that actually none of it was true (but of course the tabloids never bother to report this).

Please, when reading the right-wing tabloids, exercise some critical judgement. They have an agenda to push, and will run any story that meets that agenda, true or false (much like the Met).

2006-12-20 07:21:29 · answer #4 · answered by Captain Flaps 3 · 3 2

We are Innocent until proved guilty

However i do feel that as a member of a ethnic group my national identity, social network and religious beliefs are under threat

2006-12-27 06:20:16 · answer #5 · answered by The Fat Controller 5 · 1 0

Oh dear...not even the current happening in Ipswich can sweep away the 'Muslim question'.
Obvously this was a quid-pro-quo thing...allegedly. The London police - as is their wont - shot someone who was innocent of any extremism. The CPS - not the police decided that no charges be brought...like it or not, their money is their business. Job done.
...unless it was a media sting, with them acting on first whim after learning the men were innocent - and decided to go their usual way...finding out what their lifestyles were - and jazzing it up a wee bit with a bit of underage-sex stylee and hints of unlawful methods of making money.
Did I hear someone say 'Ipswich'?

2006-12-19 20:47:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 4

its simple mate tony blair is a gutless wanker he not got the balls to tell muslims anything so they get away with murder,simple a

2006-12-27 05:04:05 · answer #7 · answered by jeffisgame 2 · 1 0

I agree with Alphacent. It makes my blood boil too.

2006-12-22 19:36:27 · answer #8 · answered by CT 6 · 1 1

IT was all lies they said child porn was found on thier pc but it wasnt and there was no evidence of them being involved in some activity. they didnt have £28000 cash hidden but thats what they told us.

2006-12-19 16:47:26 · answer #9 · answered by d_generate3000 2 · 6 6

the current trend is if you're muslim you can get away with just about anything. Thinking of converting...



not.

2006-12-19 16:53:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 4

fedest.com, questions and answers