Commander in Chief
2006-12-19 08:32:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by tchem75 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
He does not have a military rank. He is simply the Commander In Chief.
2006-12-19 09:02:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by ikeman32 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The President of the United States as stated in Article 2 Section II of the United States Constitution is:
"The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, "
2006-12-19 08:40:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by ME 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The President shall be >>>>>Commander in Chief<<<<<< of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
2006-12-19 08:37:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by chris 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Commander in Chief
2006-12-19 08:33:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
in the start, YOU fool, CONGRESS has the flexibility to tax and SPEND... not the President. between the topics with our funds is that human beings do not realize that uncomplicated truth - they continually blame the President besides the indisputable fact that that's CONGRESS, not the President. 2d, your figures sound uncomplicated. The conflict in Afghanistan is about terrorism and radical Islam, not basically drugs. drugs are an element of the conflict besides the indisputable fact that the vast majority of the money spent in Afghanistan is going to different issues, not the drug factors. you're the poster toddler for the left - you do not have a clue. All you may do is regurgitate what the loony mendacity left's spin-meisters spoon feed you. you may't imagine for your self, do not understand a thanks to study & make certain issues beforehand you spew them carelessly. although the UN is extremely a lot a waste of time and funds, they do supply functional data once in a lengthy time period. in spite of your claims on the opposite, opium cultivation is DOWN critically, not up as you declare. the basically issues that are going up are the cost & the earnings as continually occurs at the same time as the provision of a commodity decreases. in spite of your claims, Afghanistan's contribution to the international opium market isn't replacing all that a lot - mirrored image that anti-opium efforts in Afghanistan are kind of as useful as in different source international locations. also, in spite of your choose responsible Afghanistan opium on Bush and the neo-cons, opium has been a difficulty in Afghanistan probbly considering beforehand you've been born and actual considering beforehand George Bush ever ran for any public workplace. you basically confirmed the international what an fool you're - care to attempt back? you may do IT!
2016-11-30 23:29:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Commander in Chief is the correct title.
2006-12-19 08:37:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Answerer 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
In one of his roles as president, he is commander in chief of the military.
2006-12-19 08:38:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by David S 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
bush has no official military rank due to the fact that he is not a soldier. he has complete control over the military but not the ability to officially declare war. his true position is "commander in chief of the armed forces." it then proceeds to chairman of the jointchiefs of the armed forces, then to general(4 star), leiutenant general(3 star),major general(2 star),brigidier general(1star),colonel, lt.colonel,major,sgt. major,captain,seargent/ specialist,2nd leiutenant, 1st leiutenant, corporal,private 2nd class, private 1st class.
2006-12-19 09:06:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by brad g 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is the CIC (Commander In Chief). He is ahead of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He is the head honcho.
2006-12-19 08:38:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋