2006-12-19 04:01:19 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I don't know, but I'd pay Pay-Per-View to see that
2006-12-19 04:02:38 · answer #1 · answered by Michael R 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
YOu know I like this question because I thought about it extensively before I even read it here.
I've not seen a height/weight comparison; but it seems to me Saddam has a lot more weight on Bush, and I would imagine far more upper body strength. I get the impression he can also take a punch to the face much more than Bush. Those are the advantages I've wroked out for Saddam.
Watching Bush, he seems more slim and hard in the body. I think for sure he has more endurance, so I get the impression if Sadam doesn't get him in the early rounds, he'd start to dominate round 5 and up.
All in all, if Sadam could get Bush on the ropes, he'd win by KO in round 3. I think if Bush could protect his chin, and keep away, he'd win in rounds 5 - 8 by TKO; or they'd go the 12 round distance with Bush winning on the cards.
Sadam vs that weirdo Sharon (if he were still in a situation to fight) would be a good fight, with little hope for late round action but toe to toe slugging early on. Syria's Al Assad vs. Bush would be a great match up. I'd really like to see Tony Blair vs. Putin; I think that would be like the Thrilla in Manilla. Lastly, I want to see Israeli PM Olmert vs. Chiraq.
Gonna Fly Now.
2006-12-19 08:46:30 · answer #2 · answered by 0 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam would win. Didn't George Bush get scared and run away from the National Guard?
2006-12-19 04:04:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Saddam would fall like a screaming school girl in round 3
2006-12-19 04:03:14 · answer #4 · answered by Sean 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Autobot, definite you're superb perfect we are meant to guard you from all enemies, overseas and loved ones. we are also meant to execute the orders of the officials appointed over us. And definite George Bush is technically an officer in our military. once you're going to apply those kind of statements you extremely shouldn't go away any element of the finished out. Autobot - in the start I under no circumstances reported you need to not talk up. 2d off i'm not confident if that replaced into some kind of terrible shot at propaganda for Democrats once you basically wanna 0.5-*** your data at the same time as that's going to reward your's and different's beliefs. It makes me unhappy.
2016-11-30 23:14:01 · answer #5 · answered by northcut 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam Hussain, I think that by the way George acts nowadays, he'd be too afraid to even fight him.
2006-12-19 04:08:50 · answer #6 · answered by Garrett H 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In boxing Saddam..but Bush would stamp his feet till he got his way
2006-12-19 04:07:00 · answer #7 · answered by babo1dm 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sad how many low blows people take at the President of a country that they live in, get the hell out if you don't like him or give me a good reason that he's a bad person. Just because he has a hard time speaking doesn't make him stupid. And if you've heard his recent speeches, you'd find he's gotten much better, assholes!
George would kill Hussain b/c unlike liberals, he wouldn't talk it out and kick the **** out of him.
2006-12-19 04:06:42 · answer #8 · answered by Desiree D 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush. Saddam is an out of shape shlub who's been wasting away in a prison cell. Plus he's used to getting other people to fight his battles for him.
2006-12-19 04:04:33 · answer #9 · answered by braennvin2 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Saddam in the 2nd round. He's got a hell of a right cross. Bush wouldn't even fight, he'd hire some1 out to do it.
2006-12-19 04:02:28 · answer #10 · answered by wvucountryroads 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Saddam
But the judges would be bought off making Bush the official winner
2006-12-19 04:03:57 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋