Dictatorship?

Question

If a country has a dictator, he usually rules by fear. yes the crime rates are low, life has the "illusion" of being perfect. People are given rules to live by, most just common sense, but how they will be punished if they don't follow them or "worship" the dictator.

It's a choice, worship and vote for the dictator and he will give you a better life than if you choose to vote against him.

Anyone see any similarity here?

That's why I am atheist. I will not be forced into worshiping a bully and dictator. Not that I beleive he exists, but IF I am wrong I will stand by my choice NOT to have beleived in god or worshiped him. I live my life without harming anyone and the so called "sins" that I was apparently born with I fail to see how a child has any sin at all??? I have learned by my mistakes and lived my life continually improving myself and others lives. If that's not good enough then TOUGH!!! To me being damned for eternity is far to severe a punishment for living a good life.

Wait a minute-

Why because i'm an athiest does it mean I support athiest dictators...or ANY dictator. I am merely pointing out the similarity.

and I do not hate god, i don't think he exists. I am saying that IF i am wrong, I should be judged on way I live my life, not if I beleive or worship a god!!. Makes absolutely no sense and smacks of being dictated to.

Answer 1

HOOORAAAY!!!!!!!!!

I'm with you sister!!!


By the way, I'm a Satanist, and I think that you might be one, too. Did you know that most Satanists are actually atheists who don't believe in Satan? It's true. Join us!

Answer 2

"It's a choice, worship and vote for the dictator and he will give you a better life than if you choose to vote against him."

Areyou saying you have a bad life? Its common for an athiest to say "Im fine without God,happy, adjusted, everythings cool" So unless your not a happy well adjusted atheist, this point is moot. God does not make ones life better, if so, all atheist would be miserable, and they claim they are not.

And we DO have a choice, one given by God. You made your, I made mine, and I feel neither bullied, or fooled. I learn from my mistakes, I dont blame them on God, I am imporving daily, and learning more and more to help others, I do that for me, not God.

Im sorry your angry about it, but our beliefs are different, but that does not make you superior to me in anyway.

Answer 3

Well, the query is a well one. However, you made 2 mistakes--each particularly primary. First "Socialism" and communism aren't equal. Most socialist thinkers did NOT advise the totalizing procedure of communism. I advise you learn anything of the ideas o fRobert Owens and of the English Chartist motion for the duration of the 1800s as an instance. Second, the suggestion of a "dictatorship of the proletariat" comes from Marx, no longer Lenin. As for your query--no. Maarx believed it could be. Lenin--taken as a entire, his writings exhibit he knew flawlessly good the dictatorship could no longer be transitority. Where Marx made his errors may also be analyzed a quantity of extraordinary approaches--however for me, the next is the most simple: (I'll jsut summarize the principal elements to maintain this brief): Any difficult social procedure HAS to have associations for guiding co-operative movements. That being the case,you've gotten a few humans with the energy to make choices for others. For Marx, the belief ws that , as soon as the communist state was once created, each person could be identical--just a few could have the process of constructing the selections. What Marx failed to peer is tha tgiving a few humans energy to make a decision for others, BY ITS VERY NATURE, creates social inequality and a privileged elegance. That privileged elegance will NEVER leave--for 2 motives. First, it doesn't matter what you do, you are nonetheless going to want humans with the powr to make choices. And moment, because, the preliminary institution of humans who've that energy ( people who are the "dictator" aspect of the dictatorship of the proletariat) easily would possibly not quit their positions of privilege and authority--a minimum of, no longer voluntarily. If you comply with my arguement cautiously, you'll be able to see tha tthe handiest feasible go out from wat quantities to a closed common sense loop is to postulate a most important difference in human nature--that one way or the other, the elite of the brand new society could --en masse--voluntarily resign energy--andthat their successors (keep in mind, it is a difficult procedure--any person has to direct matters) could additionally overwhelming hold to chorus from conserving onto their energy and authority, iteration after iteration. God, or dangerous, name it what you are going to. But that's NOT how people act. NOT going to occur.

Answer 4

Dictatorship as practiced by the Romans meant that someone took charge during war and was given authority. After the war or hardship, the dictator would willing return to his normal life giving up all authority.

Answer 5

Good points. That is a good reason to not be Christian but not a good reason to be an atheist. A good reason to be atheist is that the dictator doesn't exist and is actually like the wizard of OZ.

Answer 6

What about your atheist dictators, Stalin, Mao, Ho Chi Minh.

People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Even Buddhists are fighting and killing in Thialand right now and they are suppose to respect all forms of life.

I've yet to meet a Saint, how about you!

Answer 7

God has not punished you. Why do you hate Him. You have believed Satans lie. God will not condem you to hell for living a good life-He will condem you for rejecting Him.

Answer 8

Communist Countries were Atheistic Dictatorships that would kill you for being a Christian.

Do you support them killing Christians?

Answer 9

Oh my how you have ruffled the flock!

Strong is the person who can walk the good path with out a shock collar on! ; )

Answer 10

To the nutjobs equating "tax & spend" politics with atheism, you are so far off base it is funny.