calculation for cable sizing between 300AH battery and 200A power plant?

Question

1) How is the connectivity between 2# of 300AH battery and 200A Power plant made?
2) Need to know the cable sizing between battery and power plant.
3)calclation to arrive at the sizing of input cables, output cables and charging cables between battery and power plant
4) Are charging and discharging paths same in the batttery? ie when load is on battery whether the load current flows through the same cable of charging ?
5)A photograph of the system will make me understand the solution better

Answer 1

The battery and power plant statistics do not enter into the calculations.

I assume that the load is continuous, and the battery is to be continuously trickle charged.

The power plant will have to deliver the load current and battery trickle charging current, at the voltage necessary to charge the battery.

You will need to know the load current, the trickle charge current, the distance between the power supply and the battery (or load if you connect directly to it), and the voltage necessary to supply the load and trickle charge the battery.

The voltage drop will be the total current multiplied by the total circuit resistance. this resistance will be the sum of the individual conductor resistances. As an equation, this is Voltage drop = total resistance times current in amperes.

The total resistance will be the voltage drop divided by the current.

Now you know how much resistance you can stand. The National Electrical Code in the US has tables showing the resistances of various sizes of wire, and how much current they are rated to carry. From these, or maybe from you wire supplier, you can find out what size wire you need. It will need to be large enough to supply the voltage and current, and have a rating for at least that much current.

Answer 2

even in spite of the undeniable fact that nuclear potential promises for the potential desires of the destiny, in spite of the undeniable fact that it's not a "eco-friendly" potential. The social value all of us could pay contained in the destiny outweighs the benefits of nuclear vegetation / nuclear potential, taking the teachings from our previous thoughts with nuclear plant around the international. having said that, more beneficial R&D should be channeled into parts of wind, image voltaic, & water potential technology. the foremost observe right it is determination "eco-friendly" potential. after all, we in effortless words have a million earth and that is sparkling to everybody that polluting it extra may in effortless words bring about killing ourselves and our destiny generations. in effortless words "eco-friendly" potential ensures our & destiny generations' endured lifestyles in this one and in effortless words abode we've; Earth. As in all advancements, initial progression expenditures are severe yet as we strengthen and flow in the route of "eco-friendly" potential, there is continuously a tipping aspect the position "eco-friendly" potential will develop into economically plausible potential. apart from, how can human form commerce-off the price of arising sparkling potential adverse to the same old fact of organic detrimental environmental consequences of nuclear vegetation ? There could no longer be a interest of arising extra nuclear potential vegetation in any respect, contained in the face of fact of the risky consequences to the ambience. "eco-friendly" and sparkling potential should be pursued because the destiny potential answer for the destiny.