would that be right to clonate human beings?
2006-12-19 02:14:33 · 6 answers · asked by den1s_a 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Engineering
You are asking a question about belief which has no answer except on a personal level. One man's "right" is another man's "wrong", and what is perceived to be "wrong" today may be "right" in a hundred years. There are plenty of examples of that in history.
The only sure thing is that if science is capable of doing it, no amount of legislation or suppression will stop it being done eventually (either overtly or covertly), so you may as well get used to the idea. No scientific discovery to date, that I know of, has been successfully suppressed.
2006-12-19 04:37:41 · answer #1 · answered by acablue 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow what a tough question. I think that there are answers in the human being and on Planet Earth to today's toughest questions, Cancer, AIDs, other diseases. But there are like a billion people in this world, I would think we would be able to use them to test things.
2006-12-19 10:29:14 · answer #2 · answered by pepepippy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not good, but don't they already in a sense do it? We have heart transplants, eyes, kidneys etc. To go as far as a whole human being, I think something would be left out and that's not good.
2006-12-19 10:20:05 · answer #3 · answered by Candy 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The term "genetic engineering" is a misnomer as there is no engineering involved, just biology.
2006-12-19 16:36:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think it is so bad to clonate human beings because this make human like a man made subject and that makes animals better than him
2006-12-19 10:28:11 · answer #5 · answered by the winner 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not good.
2006-12-19 10:16:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋