you'd probably get a healthier meal at subway
2006-12-19 02:01:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Curious_One 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Subway.
2006-12-19 02:02:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mintygoodness1 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Eat cereal for breakfast and Subway for lunch. You will be healthier.
2006-12-19 02:02:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by ankle biter tamer 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Subway Allll the waaaaaay
2006-12-19 02:19:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tello 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Subway for lunch do doubt.
2006-12-19 02:02:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kimberly 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Subway for lunch! It's a lot healthier for you than McDonalds. Just remember that McDonalds food is loaded with fat and dripping with grease
2006-12-19 02:04:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by kerrberr95 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Subway for lunch.
Mc's breakfast is kinda greasy--not a good way to start your morning unless you wanna feel like puking for another few hours.
But why asking this Q in singles and dating by the way?
2006-12-19 02:03:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
subway for lunch because you can skip breakfast but not lunch
2006-12-19 02:02:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I suppose it would depend on how hungry you really are, and on just how long you're willing to wait. But in my own opinion. I would go to
Subway as the food there is considerably healthier for you.
2006-12-19 02:08:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mike M. 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
subway for lunch
2006-12-19 02:03:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
subway for lunch. subway is alot healthyer and you get more of a sandwhich. I always pick subways eat fresh
2006-12-19 02:03:20
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋