English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

25 answers

you'd probably get a healthier meal at subway

2006-12-19 02:01:45 · answer #1 · answered by Curious_One 3 · 1 0

Subway.

2006-12-19 02:02:10 · answer #2 · answered by Mintygoodness1 4 · 0 0

Eat cereal for breakfast and Subway for lunch. You will be healthier.

2006-12-19 02:02:32 · answer #3 · answered by ankle biter tamer 2 · 0 0

Subway Allll the waaaaaay

2006-12-19 02:19:46 · answer #4 · answered by Tello 1 · 0 0

Subway for lunch do doubt.

2006-12-19 02:02:22 · answer #5 · answered by Kimberly 2 · 0 0

Subway for lunch! It's a lot healthier for you than McDonalds. Just remember that McDonalds food is loaded with fat and dripping with grease

2006-12-19 02:04:18 · answer #6 · answered by kerrberr95 5 · 0 0

Subway for lunch.

Mc's breakfast is kinda greasy--not a good way to start your morning unless you wanna feel like puking for another few hours.

But why asking this Q in singles and dating by the way?

2006-12-19 02:03:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

subway for lunch because you can skip breakfast but not lunch

2006-12-19 02:02:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I suppose it would depend on how hungry you really are, and on just how long you're willing to wait. But in my own opinion. I would go to
Subway as the food there is considerably healthier for you.

2006-12-19 02:08:19 · answer #9 · answered by Mike M. 7 · 0 0

subway for lunch

2006-12-19 02:03:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

subway for lunch. subway is alot healthyer and you get more of a sandwhich. I always pick subways eat fresh

2006-12-19 02:03:20 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers