Refurbished professional digital cameras costs significantly less than the new ones. The come with a manufacterer warranty. What are the pros and cons of buying one?
2006-12-18 23:54:50 · 5 answers · asked by jflsdkjflsad 2 in Consumer Electronics ➔ Cameras
If the refurb model will suit your needs, and it has the features you're seeking, go for the refurb. Most electronics will be tested at a rate of 1 out of 10 up to 1 out of 100. This means that you have from 9 to 99 cameras going through the line, and only 1 of them will be tested for quality control. On the other hand, if it's a refurb, it will be individually tested to be assured that any defects it had previously were corrected, that it passes all quality and cosmetic checks, and that everything - EVERYTHING - works.
I've purchased refurb items from Dell, Epson and Nikon. No problems ever.
2006-12-20 04:36:49 · answer #1 · answered by webpager 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with what Window said. You probably know whether you're an "early" adopter of technology (you value having the newest features and are willing to pay for that) or a late adopter (like me - I like paying a lot less for technology a year after it comes out and noticing how much less I paid than someone did just 12 months before) or somewhere in between.
So long as you buy from a reputable site, you will not have a problem with mechanical failure or anything like that.
2006-12-19 09:01:51 · answer #2 · answered by Rose 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go for the new one. It is more expensive, but it might give you peace of mind. I am not saying that the new model is 100% defect free, but we are talking about a $1000 camera at least. So invest you money wisely.
2006-12-19 11:11:47 · answer #3 · answered by Marcos Canada 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Refurb. Pro:Cheap Con:Not cheap enough.
2006-12-22 08:20:01 · answer #4 · answered by Bob 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Buying older models means you're buying older technology... if you're good with that, then buy the cheaper model.
2006-12-19 08:03:55 · answer #5 · answered by WindowLicker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋