if you have situation that you do not have any child now and a poor man who is having cancer (or any reason) and he can not care his child . which is better the adopted son of that man or the son of your own genes.You belongs to India where population is allready high.also please justify your answer.
2006-12-18 16:36:43 · 12 answers · asked by KrishanRam(Jitendra k) 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I am still single but always in mind that if I could affordable, I want to adopt a child from any background. If you really want to adopt a child, do it without any prejudice. A child is gift from GOD, treat them as GOD also.
I have used the word "affordable". Not mean that I must be rich but at least could give a comfortable life. I do not want adopt and abandon, that would be sin.
2006-12-18 16:59:51 · answer #1 · answered by parasakris 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is better to help the child in need of a home. I don't live in India, I am in the US but here it is so hard to adopt! And so many of the children who are up for adoption and are older have serious mental or health issues because of their parents treatment of them or drug and alcohol use during pregnancy.
We have considered adopting and will probably adopt an older child when we are ready for our third, but honestly we do have concerns on how it will affect our children. How bad will it be? Will there be violence or serious behavioral issues and how would we resolve it.
However as humans we have the ability to love people out of our gene pool so if that is not the issue in this case definitely adopt if you can afford it.
2006-12-18 16:45:49 · answer #2 · answered by micheletmoore 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Adopt, the child is the future and no child is above the other they are all equal it is what they do as adults that will determine how they are judged from the other. If you can give this child a good start to life by all means do so and with blessings for doing so.
2006-12-18 16:43:51 · answer #3 · answered by polynesiachick 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would have to say an adopted child. He needs attention therefore i would say adopted. If you had a son he would have more attention in the country (USA) but if you adopted this son in India he would at least have a chance in living. So why not adopt this child from India. You would at least spare him from dying.
2006-12-18 16:46:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a birthmom, i'm no longer against adoption in any respect. I gave my little lady up and don't sense sorry approximately it for a 2d. I do consider people however... in case you prefer the toddler save it, and pass out of your mum and dad residing house. There are materials that may assist you thru this. in case you relatively think of the toddler could have a extra powerful life without you, then please by utilising all potential do what's physically powerful on your toddler and supply it up. Giving up my toddler is the toughest element I ever did, yet because of the fact i replaced right into a individual who struggled with various addictions, and so for my toddler no longer having that lady that i used to be for a mom, replaced into appropriate for her. This determination isn't approximately you costly, that's approximately your toddler. i got here upon the ideal thank you to convey it up replaced into to take a seat down your mum and dad down, and tell them what you prefer to do and tell them why that's appropriate for the toddler. concentration on the toddler and not the faults of the folk around you. it quite is ideal.
2016-10-05 12:02:09 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you should adopt the child of the poor
2006-12-18 16:52:36 · answer #6 · answered by san42 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am sorry sweetie. I don't understand your question.
When someone adopts a child, they should love that child and their blood children the same.
2006-12-18 16:41:10 · answer #7 · answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No one child is better. They all require the same love and care.
2006-12-18 16:40:09 · answer #8 · answered by Kalia 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Neither is better than the other. They are both children who need love and attention.
That is too simple. I'm not sure I understand your question.
2006-12-18 16:44:08 · answer #9 · answered by howdigethere 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think you should help a poor person cause he could starve to death and that could be the end for him even throw you could also get a rich kid but i think you should get the poor kid but its my answer and you don't have to chose it,good luck
2006-12-18 16:43:41 · answer #10 · answered by ang guzman 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋