English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have read a few of your answers, to this question, on here but I keep going back and looking at my anatomy book and it says that the top layer is the dermis, the second layer is the epidermis and the third layer with all the veins and arteries is the subcutaneous layer. So to me I would think that a subcutaneous injection would allow more of a rapid absorption then an intradermal injection. Please help, I am so confused!!!

2006-12-18 15:23:06 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health Other - Health

3 answers

I think that the absorption rate would probably only differ by a few seconds. If youve been looking for the answer for hours then your probably burnt. Take a break!

2006-12-18 15:32:15 · answer #1 · answered by Topaz 3 · 0 0

an intradermal injection is not actually absorbed into the blood stream. an example is a tb test.

2006-12-19 00:43:13 · answer #2 · answered by pandora078 6 · 0 0

DRUGS ARE EVIL~DONT DESTROY YOUR LIFE AND YOUR FAMILYS

2006-12-18 23:25:35 · answer #3 · answered by free-spirit 5 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers