There is no way you could teach intelligent design without teaching unintelligent design (FSMism). That would be hypocritical to the utmost. They both have as much supporting evidence as eachother (FSM actually fits much more of the observable evidence), and teach the controvosy demands they both be given equal time.
That is, if this mental education system decides to devalue (in the words of the prophet) "logical conjecture based on overwhelming observable evidence".
RAmen.
Oh and .org web sites deffinately exist, so "slave to JC" is a newly converted pastafarian.
2006-12-18 12:33:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Om 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
i in my view won't be able to comprehend you human beings. i'm a creationist and that i think in evolution of the universe and of existence. i do no longer understand why human beings think of that the two are contradictory. the reason that i'm a creationist is that i think that the universe got here from someplace and that there grow to be no longer in easy terms a great volume of count, dimensions, and rules that govern each thing in that universe. I additionally don't have self assurance that the universe exists and not using a objective. each thing has a objective, there's a reason for each thing. i don't have self assurance interior the biblical God, or some previous guy sitting interior the clouds, yet I do have self assurance in an clever writer. All of you ignorant atheist are probably questioning approximately what a dumbass i'm, approximately how I merely dream up some god via fact i'm too afraid to settle for the possiblity that the universe merely is, that I blindly carry on with the previous techniques of creationism without giving it any seen my very own. enable me enable you to recognize something: i used to be an antheist to boot. I then found out what an ignorant guy or woman i in my view grow to be. i assumed that guy's mind and technological information might desire to describe each thing and that folk who believed in "a god" have been merely afraid of accepting the actuality, till i found out that it grow to be I who grow to be afraid, and that it grow to be my very own ego that would not enable me to settle for the possibility.
2016-12-15 03:54:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by endicott 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
well..it is just as valid. so if one side of creationism is taught than the other side should as well, then the students can pick which one makes more sense from the god waving fingers idea, from the flying spaghetti monster, or from the theories backed with scientific evidence, for themselves.
2006-12-18 12:31:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Poo 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Kraft macaroni and cheese dinner cooking should be taught everywhere.
Get A Grip
2006-12-18 12:31:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Get A Grip 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Invisible Pink Unicorn (peace be upon her) is going to throw you and your false god into the eternal lake of fire.
http://www.palmyra.demon.co.uk/humour/ipu.htm
2006-12-18 12:34:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
you have got to be kidding? do you believe every thing you see? yeah i know, there are loads of churches that seem ligit but they are full of crap. it puts a bad name on the belief but i think it's just mocking. some bozo trying to get attention which seems to have worked.
2006-12-18 12:32:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Kids, go play outside.
No foolishness in the house.
<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>
2006-12-18 12:31:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
RAmen!
2006-12-18 12:33:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by -skrowzdm- 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
when you believe in .org web sites, so will I believe in FSM
2006-12-18 12:32:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Slave to JC 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Always has to be one in the crowd...
2006-12-18 12:37:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by You Have No Idea 1
·
0⤊
2⤋