English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

have to look no farther than a mirror to see one

like Al Sharpton and
pro-illegals,,,,,,,please explain how pro-illegal is a logical stance if you are not racist yourself against white Americans

do tou think those people have a hatred fore white people,,,nahh couldn't be

why don't they fight for the plight of all immigrants not just latinos

this BS has got to be called out Don't you think that someone should be damn sure someone else is a racist before they accuse them of it, That term holds a lot of volume and shouldn't be abused

any thoughts on this

2006-12-18 09:41:40 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

10 answers

I agree.

The "race card" usually gets played to detract from the fact that what the person screaming racist is doing, is either illegal, immoral, or unethical.

2006-12-18 09:46:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 3

Illegal is illegal. Al Sharpton will say anything to get press coverage. Reverse discrimination will only continue if we sit around and do nothing. Whites(that I know) had cooled their racial jets for a while till they started getting pushed into a corner by the demands, not the rights, the DEMANDS of others. If you are an African-American or a Mexican-American you aren't an American. You are an American when you shed the prefix and the attitude that I owe you something. Work WITH me and I will work WITH you, hold out your hand and I will spit in it.
Sorry for the rant but..but..well you know

2006-12-18 10:01:23 · answer #2 · answered by johnnydean86 4 · 2 0

The radical Marxists groups like La Raza Unida and
the Brown Berets are counterparts of the KKK.The only thing different is the color of their members skins.

The use of the race card is the last defense someone has when their other arguments have no validity.They want to silence the other person so they bring the old worn out race card and throw it into the fray.The person
objecting to their views ,gos Oh my God,I'm not a racist and forgets what he was talking about in order to defend him/her self against the charge of racism.So it works in successfully shutting down the opposition.
Well guess what,the race card has no affect on me or my argument.It cant shut me down,because I know who and what I am,their words cant hurt me.I know I'm not a racists so I ignore the word along with their BS and continue on my presentation of my facts that illegal aliens are harmful to this nation.Words cant hurt me unless I empower them,and I refuse to allow them to cause me any problems.So call me any thing you like ,I know who and what I am,you cant hurt me with false accusations of racism

2006-12-18 13:05:06 · answer #3 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 0 0

I think that every time that they talk about racism and then they laugh about white people being horrible or Americans being lazy. All this complaining, yet when I see questions disparaging the U.S and her people, they freely join in- all the while enjoying her comforts and privileges. Additionally, I wonder if they care about Arabs. In the event of an amnesty, as we know "all illegals are hardworking and just came here for a better life," do they realize how unevenly such an amnesty would be applied to Arabs? Do they care?

2006-12-18 10:57:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

People like Al Sharpton only care about getting their name in the paper. The only time you see him craw out from under his rock is to support his own agenda. I have been dismissing him and Jackson for years because it is obvious that their speeches only apply to a certain demographic.

They are total hypocrites.

2006-12-18 09:57:28 · answer #5 · answered by Steve 5 · 2 0

I think you have to hand it to Al Sharpton. I was once very angry with him over the Tawana Brawley case when I lived near Poughkeepsie, NY because a lot of really good people were almost ruined because the girl skipped school and lied about being raped by a bunch of prominent white persons.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tawana_Brawley

I think our society needs people like Al Sharpton to keep us on our toes and champion people who are abused by the system and I know now he was totally misled by Tawana.

I would vote for Al the way things stand now. I think he would make a great politician and President. I think he would not have led us into war or done all the mess bush has done.

Shooting a man because he is black is not the way our country should be run and that is essentially what happened.

Racism is alive an well according to what you write.

If you were in trouble the ACLU and people like Al Sharpton would be the first to try to help you regardless of your color, creed, or religion.

2006-12-18 09:49:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

u.s. is a lot extra in contact approximately court docket circumstances and politically maximum suitable than the final public of the international. This has to do with our guilt encumbered history... as though we are the only united states of america in the international that has violence between the races, cultures, religions et al? i think of by using fact we make project out of it, it relatively is going to become bigger than it particularly is in little circumstances...and performed down in the bigger circumstances. some issues are dealt with nicely...yet, what we tend to take heed to approximately...are those which at the instant are not dealt with nicely in any respect. it relatively is totally complicated. so a strategies as particular human beings...who cares what they think of? Are we no longer all entitled to our critiques? And, do any human beings particularly need to take heed to different individuals's critiques? individually i could fairly say issues that build human beings up, fairly than tear them down.

2016-10-15 04:53:58 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I agree with you. I am one of those hippies that wishes that everyone could get along..but I know that isn't going to happen, unless everyone got a lobatomy.

But yes, I do agree with you.

2006-12-18 09:51:52 · answer #8 · answered by Bevin M 3 · 2 0

Yes from now on to counter their ignorance we will say anyone who is a pro illegal supporter is a racist against whites. They will from this day forth be referred as racist. Because after all when they have a problem with Americans, they only mention whites

2006-12-18 09:46:12 · answer #9 · answered by throw them out 1 · 4 4

I agree with the first answer 100%!!

2006-12-18 09:48:21 · answer #10 · answered by WHITE GIRL 3 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers