when the prophet jesus(PBUH) was a child he was immature,if you say he way God ,then you say that God was immature,if you say he was apart of God then that means also that God was immature (as you believe he was apart)
logically as God isnt immature then the prophet jesus(PBUH) was neither God nor a part of God ,what do you think now?
2006-12-18 07:02:49 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I totally agree with you.The prophet Jesus(As) was neither God nor the son of God.But what he is,is a beloved prophet of God.
2006-12-18 07:06:38 · answer #1 · answered by Sherzade 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You cannot logically conclude anything in this realm of irrationality. There can never be a logical conclusion that includes the supernatural deity-- which is defined as something beyond human comprehension. Without basing your premises on reality, there is no way to rationally conclude anything.
Oh, Jesus was just a prophet and not God since another set of religious people claim *their* superstitions are true.
2006-12-18 15:08:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
They never said Jesus was immature, as a matter of fact they say that He was teaching in the temple at a very young age. His understanding of scripture amazed the rabbi's and he was known for this. So try again.
2006-12-18 15:09:52 · answer #3 · answered by Kia V 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You base your "logic" on a false premise. Jesus was God in the flesh. He lived and grew as a child and yet never sinned. The word "immaturity" refers to someone who behaves in a way that is behind where his or her maturity should be for his or her age, so Jesus was never "immature" because he always behaved in accordance with his age (or maybe ahead) but always without sin.
The Gnostics struggled with this concept of God living inside of human flesh. They believed that spirit and flesh couldn't co-exist, and so, though they wanted to believe the Bible, they kept trying to define it in their own terms according to their own understanding instead of just reading what it says. That is what you are also doing--trying to understand Jesus through the filter of your own ideas and understanding instead of just seeing what he said about himself.
2006-12-18 15:11:49 · answer #4 · answered by happygirl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um....I still think he was part of God, God in the flesh, having human emotion just like humans, but thought as God would. Jesus, even at 12, was teaching the priests in the temple, how is that for 'immature'?
2006-12-18 15:05:00 · answer #5 · answered by sweetie_baby 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Ahmad this forum is not to attack other relegions I daresay you know that and speaking of emotions flaring up I see yours are right now. Logic tells me your question is not logical at all.
2006-12-18 15:10:13 · answer #6 · answered by Laela (Layla) 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are "presuming" Jesus was an immature child. How do you know that??
2006-12-18 15:05:35 · answer #7 · answered by MeanKitty 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Good question. Could you ask it again? I didn't understand the first time :-\
2006-12-18 15:08:01 · answer #8 · answered by Goober W 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋