This guy is obviously a deluded **** faced loner, i mean he befriends prostitutes and lures them in, then he kills them. ok maybe we shouldnt just assume, but i think he is guilty.
He is a weak man who picked out easy targets.
As far as i'm concerned, lock him up and throw away the key, the law is always too soft on these harsh characters, they get released and end up preying on small children or the elderley, they prey on the easy targets.
I think he is guilty as a burglar caught in the act.
2006-12-18 06:29:37 · 22 answers · asked by snow white 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
Hes obviously mentally disturbed, if he was a woman, with a mental illness, you wouldnt see them locked away for long.
2006-12-18 10:29:37 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, i am quite sure that the person/persons who killed the five girls is indeed 'guilty' of killing them. But there is one little thing, that your question has overlooked.
That is innocent 'until pr oven guilty' - never - ever - be backward enough to say 'once the person is arrested he/she must therefore be guilty'
Being a suspected person under arrest by the police - does not mean guilt or innocence has been established.
It is for a court and a jury of peers to decide - if the matter gets that far.
2006-12-18 14:51:34 · answer #2 · answered by greagues2 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What a stupid f@*king question. How the hell are we supposed to know whether he is guilty or not? We have only a couple of facts portayed by the media (which may or may not be accurate). You can't make a judgement on a photograph and besides, I'm quite surprised the media has been allowed to use the photo, even though he is only being questioned. This is dangerous, especially when people "take law into their own hands"
2006-12-18 14:38:26 · answer #3 · answered by GayAtheist 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Of course the Ipswitch killer is guilty. He killed 5 women didn't he? Now if you mean the guy who's in custody then I guess we need to let the authorities and the Brittish court system figure that one out don't we?
2006-12-18 21:36:22 · answer #4 · answered by Leigh P 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is early days to accuse anyone at this stage. This topic should be left to the police and courts to decide not the Yahoo Answers. How can anyone come on here discussing a police investigation still going on to find the killer. If you read the news in depth it does say a suspect and not their man who is the killer.
2006-12-18 18:55:27 · answer #5 · answered by CT 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
My God this is the 21st Century not the 17th but the witch hunt and finger pointing has already started. Salem's lot.
Let us wait and see before the faggots are piled up around the stake ready for the burning of this person who has not even been charged. Innocent until proven guilty.
I hate to say this but it is not only Gordon that is a Moron..if you follow my meaning.
2006-12-18 14:40:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Innocent until proven guilty. The man has not been charged, let alone convicted.
If he is convicted, then definately lock him up and throw away the key. But before then he must be charged, tried and convicted before a jury of his peers. Anything else is mob law which is both dangerous and injust.
2006-12-18 14:32:57 · answer #7 · answered by Cardinal Fang 5 · 6⤊ 0⤋
The Ipswich killer is 100% guilty. As for the man that the police have arrested, that has yet to be proven.
2006-12-18 14:37:03 · answer #8 · answered by Polo 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
no, i think this man is just a suspect, nothing has been proven yet, but yes when they do get the real killer totally agree with you.
but then again, i don't c why everyone freaks out about this guy when there is thousands of other psychotic sociopath serial killers out in the world
2006-12-18 14:36:44 · answer #9 · answered by livinia 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
As other have said its to early and not for us to decide.
A SIMPLE OBSERVATION
The killer preys on weakens in his victims, the user 'drugs are killers' seems to want to pray on you for one spelling mistake. I wouldn't like to be a prostitute when hes around!
2006-12-18 20:14:15 · answer #10 · answered by daveshere 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋