That's about the extent of their argument. They can't produce (except complete fabrications) evidence. They just attack the evidence of evolution with pseudoscientific rhetoric.
2006-12-18 05:38:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
lol people who believe in god (any god) deep down are scared of not existing which is why the afterlife was invented. Its sucks when you realize that you will most likely cease too exist when you die. People are born into their religions so it's like dental work (drilled into your head). If you think about it there is no reason to believe in jesus or allah or zeus. Its all made up in some way. Now hardcore believers will say "the bible says so it's true" They are morons. There are more greek text dealing with the gods as there are dealing with jesus. Why does one hold more water then the other? Personal taste! If you tell bible folk the truth abouth the bible, that it is full of contradictions they won't believe you. Here's one. theres so many i just picked one. IT says in one verse that god could do no evil such as tempt but in a different verse it says he tempted abarham. ITs one after another of contradictions like this. I know jesus is not my lord and saviour. How do i know? Common sense. Now they will say "well how was the universe created then"?...I offer you this..we do not need to know everything. Now is there a supreme being. I don't know. Something can't come from nothing so if there is a god that does not mean there is a afterlife. We just don't know and anyone who says they do is lying to themself.....Its all fear of not existing..Ofcourse evolution is right. There's proof. Why can't bible freaks atleast say evolution is a tool of god? There so lame.
2006-12-18 11:48:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Green Meds 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
That's brilliant. Get the creationists out in the open and expose their ignorance. The fact of evolution is not in question and even the mechanisms of it that are theoretical are accounted for by natural selection which isn't challenged by any competing theory. Evolution is well established and creationists are incapable of doing anything about it except resort to abuse.
2006-12-18 11:38:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
No, no argument using the verb "to suck" (not meaning to draw something in by or as if by a vacuum) is a valid one. This meaning of the verb "to suck" is subjective and a valid argument has to be objective(at least in this kind of disscution).
P.S. i thought we were supposed to disscuss the validity of the argument not the truthfullness of the evolutionist/creationist theory, nor debait the existence of God
2006-12-18 11:39:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
creationism is natural. It is the existence in a way beyond positive and negative. Most creationism comes after destruction or weeding of unwanted elements.
2006-12-18 11:34:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Wow it sounds like the argument Liberals try to explain why they hate Bush.
I've never heard anyone say what you've said. Now if I was a Dodo Bird MAYBE I would say it sucked.
2006-12-18 11:32:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by madbaldscotsman 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Great link but the creationist will never read it since most of them are too narrow minded to ever read anything that demonstrates what they think is wrong.
2006-12-18 11:36:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
No, it's not a valid arguement. The creator is GOD and no one should question GOD after reading the bible. You might want to try that. Maybe you will get the answers you are looking for. Good luck and GOD bless you.
2006-12-18 11:38:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by cookie 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
It's not even a valid joke. Evolution doesn't suck. It would have to be real to do that. Jesus loves you.
2006-12-18 11:31:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Evolutionists doesnt have answers to their idiotic theory
2006-12-18 11:37:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by (",)Smokey_-" 2
·
0⤊
4⤋