i would trust him if he admitted to his lies...b/c i would have to admit to my lies...and it takes a liar to know a liar...so even if you were a pathological liar....i would know when your lieing...besides i understand that sometimes you just cant put the oppurtunity to lie down....but it also depends on what you lie about....i hope i didnt just confuse you........
2006-12-18 02:27:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by So over-used 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yep lots of people just say they are liars for attention or because they think it's cool it's the people who say they never lie those are the ones to look out for I know someone who tells people she is unable to lie because she acts too guilty voice changes etc. but is actually an incredibly good liar she may even lead a double life hmmm wonder how I know all of her secrets?
2006-12-18 02:30:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Everyone is a liar so I would trust the one that admitted it more. But you must know, there are only 2 reasons you should lie:
To keep yourself out of trouble or to keep from hurting someone's feelings.
2006-12-18 02:26:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by K-E-G 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Umm...neither.
And there is no such thing as 100% honest.
2006-12-18 05:15:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by DoubleD 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't trust either one. At least not until they earned it!
2006-12-18 02:50:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Merrily 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Trust is earned.
2006-12-18 02:24:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sunflower 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Neither - they're both liars
2006-12-18 02:33:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
i wouldnt, cuz well honnesty is the best polosy!!!
2006-12-18 02:24:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by *Living a {{ღяøM@N!Cღ}} Tragity* 5
·
0⤊
1⤋